Background: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancers in the USA, and the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women. Ola is a PARPi approved for first-line maintenance treatment of BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer in women who achieve a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Ola is also efficacious in combination with bevacizumab in the same population, independent of BRCA mutation status. Cer is a potent, oral, selective inhibitor of ATR. ATR is a critical DDR kinase that is activated in response to replication stress and stalled replication forks. There is no second maintenance standard of care for patients with PSR ovarian cancer who have previously received a PARPi in the maintenance setting. Pre-clinical models have shown that several mechanisms of PARPi resistance may be overcome by ATR inhibition, such as BRCA reversion, replication fork protection and DDR rewiring. DUETTE will select pts with tumor response or stable disease after second or third-line platinum-based treatment, with the expectation to enrich for non-BRCA reversion PARPi resistance mechanisms. The study will address the role of a second maintenance treatment following prior 1L or 2L maintenance, an emerging population of unmet need, and includes translational studies that aim to further our knowledge of clinical PARPi resistance mechanisms and predictors of treatment response. Methods: DUETTE is a global, multi-center, phase II study. 192 pts with PSR epithelial ovarian cancer who have previously received PARPi maintenance treatment, will be retreated with platinum and those who have not progressed after ≥ 4 cycles will be randomized (1:1:1) to 3 treatment arms: Arm 1, open-label: cer 160 mg once daily (qd) days 1 to 7 plus ola 300 mg twice daily (bd); Arm 2, blinded: ola monotherapy 300 mg bd and Arm 3, blinded: ola-placebo. Treatment is administered in 28-day cycles. All pts will be stratified by BRCA status (mutation or wildtype) and response to most recent line of platinum-based chemotherapy (CR/PR or SD). The primary endpoint is to assess the efficacy of maintenance ola monotherapy and cer+ola combination therapy compared with placebo by PFS using blinded, independent central review. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS2, ORR, DoR, safety and tolerability. Enrolment is planned to start in April 2020.

Background: Liposomal irinotecan administered with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is approved in the USA for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) following progression with gemcitabine-based therapy. A phase 1/2 study in previously untreated locally advanced/metastatic PDAC showed promising anti-tumor activity with liposomal irinotecan 50 mg/m2 free base + 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 + LV 400 mg/m2 + oxaliplatin (OX) 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle (Wainberg et al. Ann Oncol 2019;30 Suppl 4: SO-005). Herein, we present the design of the phase 3 NAPOLI-3 study investigating the efficacy and safety of this regimen as first-line therapy in patients with mPDAC. Methods: NAPOLI-3 (NCT04083235) is a phase 3, open-label, randomized, global study in adults with histologically/cytologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma not previously treated in the metastatic setting. Patients are required to have one or more metastatic tumors measurable with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0–1. Site activation began in Dec 2019 and enrollment is ongoing. Random allocation (1:1) of 750 patients is planned to liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV + OX (regimen as per phase 1/2 study) or nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall response rate assessed with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 criteria) will be compared only if the primary endpoint shows superiority for liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/ LV + OX over nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine. Safety assessments include adverse-event monitoring. Patients will continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or study withdrawal, and will then be followed for survival every 2 months until death or study end (when all patients have died, withdrawn consent or are lost to follow-up).

Ceralasertib is a potent and selective ATP competitive inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) in clinical development as monotherapy and in combination with olaparib (Lynparza) and durvalumab (Imfinzi) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Paired pre- and on-treatment tumour samples from seven patients during ceralasertib monotherapy in Phase 1 studies (NCT02223923, NCT02264678), all ATM expressing, showed increases in pRAD50 on treatment. This study aimed to robustly understand the relationship between ceralasertib pharmacokinetics, pRAD50 (pSer635) induction by immunohistochemistry and anti-tumor efficacy, in mouse xenografted models; to enable interpretation of paired clinical tumour samples. First, in vivo data were generated in a range of xenografted models (HBCx9 [TNBC, Xentech], HCC1806 [BC], OCI-Ly19 [DLBCL] and OE21 [HNSCC]) and NSCLC and HNSCC PDX models at Champions). Mouse ceralasertib doses (6.25 - 25mg/kg BID and 50mg/kg QD) reflected the observed free drug exposure achieved at clinical doses. In pharmacodynamic studies, animals were dosed continuously for 5 days, with PKPD endpoints being assessed on the 5th day. In anti-tumor studies, animals were randomized and treated for at least 28 days continuously. Increases in pRAD50 on treatment, versus control, were both dose and time dependent. There was a wide range of baseline pRAD50 expression (H-Scores ranging from 2 to 48) but the fold increase was consistent; a 3-fold increase being seen at the highest dose. Similarly, the anti-tumor activity was dose dependent with a range of sensitivities being observed across the models; the OCI-Ly19 model was most sensitive with %TGI ranging 43% to 104%. Mathematical modelling confirmed a consistent PKPD relationship for the fold increase of pRAD50. The effect was not saturated at the tested drug exposures and the slope relating drug in plasma to fold pRAD50 increases was estimated to be 0.75 uM-1. Modelling also demonstrated a relationship between pRAD50 and the observed anti-tumor activity, across all models. Of note, the fold induction required for efficacy increased with the baseline pRAD50 The hypothesis for this observation is that the baseline pRAD50 H-score is a functional measure of DDR signaling and so low pRAD50 may be indicative of impaired signaling and thus sensitivity to inhibition of DDR signaling. The results demonstrate the utility of generating PKPD-Efficacy relationships across a range of patient relevant xenografts and PDXs. Here, a marker of ATR inhibitor pharmacology, pRAD50, has been related to anti-tumor activity increasing our understanding of predictive markers of drug sensitivity. Clinical translation of these findings is being tested in a Phase I study, where patients provide paired tumour biopsies pre-treatment and following ceralasertib monotherapy dosing

Background: Decision making in HL is complicated by clinical trial results that differ, a growing range of treatment options, and the absence of ideal, objective information on long term outcomes from modern therapy. Methods: We formed an international consortium, HoLISTIC, consisting of 50+ pediatric & adult HL providers, decision scientists, statisticians, epidemiologists, and patient (pt) advocates and are creating a data repository of individual pt data (IPD) from 16 contemporary, pediatric & adult clinical trials for newly diagnosed pts with HL, and 6 large HL registries/survivorship cohorts, the latter enriched with LE data (Table). We will enhance our prior decision model (DM) from group-level data (Parsons S et al. B J Haem 2018) to establish a dynamic HL DM from IPD. Using statistical and simulation modeling of IPD, the enhanced DM will project outcomes of interest, including quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), reflecting both mortality and morbidity. Results will be validated and calibrated against prominent external cohorts (e.g., St. Jude LIFE Cohort, Dutch HL registry). The DM then will be converted to a web-based platform that we will test and evaluate among HL providers and pts at the point of care. Results: To date, we have harmonized IPD from 10 trials (~8,000 HL pts), ranging in size from 165-1925 pts. At diagnosis, median age was 26 y (IQR 18-38); 51.5% were male. 43% had B symptoms, 34% had mediastinal bulk, and 79% had nodular sclerosis histology. Median follow up was 5.0 y (IQR 3.5-7.4). IPD harmonization is ongoing, which will be followed by creation of the enhanced DM. Conclusions: HoLISTIC capitalizes on a multidisciplinary pediatric & adult oncology collaborative, harmonizing extensive IPD by linking data from clinical trials and real world registries/survivorship cohorts. This work will inform questions about the influence of Tx options on both acute and potential long term events and how those options align with pt values and preferences.

New therapeutic antigen-specific approaches are required to generate and sustain therapeutic immune responses against tumour specific antigens in cancer. Based on twenty years of experience with attempt to maximise the induction of potent T cell responses against infectious pathogens in humans we have begun to assess the utility of non-replicating viral vectors in cancer. Two trials in prostate cancer patients have completed enrolment and another in lung cancer is planned. We have reported efficacy data for a novel vaccine based on two replication-deficient viruses, chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx1) and MVA, targeting an oncofetal self-antigen 5T4, administered as a single agent and in combination with anti-PD-1 in mouse tumour models. Based on recently reported encouraging safety and exceptional T cell immunogenicity in a phase I “VANCE” study (NCT02390063) of me with localised prostate cancer, the phase I/II trial, ADVANCE (NCT03815942) was undertaken to test vaccine safety and efficacy in combination with PD-1 blockade in metastatic prostate castrate-resistant cancer (mCPRC). We find a satisfactory safety profile for the use of these viral vectored vaccines with anti-PD1 in mCRPC patients but with lower immunogenicity than in localised prostate cancer patients. However, an encouraging response rate, as measured the reduction in PSA levels by 50%, was observed in this trial and options for enhancing immunogenicity and efficacy further will be discussed.

Introduction Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in solid tumors describes isolation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) molecules in plasma following definitive treatment of a cancer. Detection of MRD following surgical tumor excision categorizes patients as high risk for disease recurrence. Establishing an MRD approach to treating early-stage NSCLC will facilitate escalation of standard of care (SoC) treatment only in patients destined to relapse from their cancer and overcome challenges associated with conventional adjuvant drug-trial design. Here, we present data from the lung TRACERx study where patients with early-stage NSCLC underwent phylogenetic ctDNA profiling following resection. Methods Patient specific anchored-multiplex PCR (AMP) enrichment panels were generated for 78 lung TRACERx patients who underwent surgery for stage I-III NSCLC; 608 plasma samples were analyzed. Extensive patient-specific cfDNA enrichment panels targeted a median of 196 (range 72 to 482) clonal and subclonal variants detected in primary tumor tissue by multi-region exome sequencing. A novel MRD-caller controlled and estimated background sequencing error to maximize ctDNA detection at low mutant allele frequencies (MAFs). Analytical validation experiments benchmarked assay performance. Results Analytical validation of a 50-variant AMP-MRD assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% for mutant DNA at a MAF of 0.008% (with 25ng of DNA input into the assay), specificity was 100% experimentally and 99.9% (95% CI: 99.67 to 99.99%) modelled in-silico. 45 patients suffered relapse of their primary NSCLC; ctDNA was detected at or before clinical relapse in 37 of 45 patients. In these 37 patients the median ctDNA lead-time (time from ctDNA detection to clinical relapse) was 151 days (range 0 to 984 days) and the median time to relapse from surgery was 413 days (range 41 to 1242 days). In 10 of 10 patients who developed second primary cancers during follow-up no ctDNA was detected, reflecting specificity of the MRD assay toward the primary tumor. In 23 patients who remained relapse-free during a median of 1184 days of study follow-up, ctDNA was detected in 1 of 199 time-points analyzed. Analysis of SoC adjuvant surveillance imaging (CT, PET-CT or MRI, 220 encounters) revealed examples of MRD positive patients where SoC radiological surveillance was negative for impending relapse. Through application of large cfDNA enrichment panels targeting up to 483 variants per patient we observed dynamic changes in clonal composition and copy-number status prior to NSCLC relapse, categorized relapse as monoclonal or polyclonal and identified distinct subclonal dynamics during systemic intervention for disease recurrence. Conclusions ctDNA is an adjuvant biomarker capable of both detecting MRD following surgery and defining the clonality of relapsing disease. These data pave the way for clinical trials predicated on escalation of adjuvant standard of care in NSCLC patients who exhibit MRD positive status following surgery.

Purpose: Tumor hypoxia fuels an aggressive tumor phenotype and confers resistance to anticancer treatments. We conducted a clinical trial to determine whether the antimalarial drug atovaquone, a known mitochondrial inhibitor, reduces hypoxia in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Patients with NSCLC scheduled for surgery were recruited sequentially into two cohorts: cohort 1 received oral atovaquone at the standard clinical dose of 750 mg twice daily, while cohort 2 did not. Primary imaging endpoint was change in tumor hypoxic volume (HV) measured by hypoxia PET-CT. Intercohort comparison of hypoxia gene expression signatures using RNA sequencing from resected tumors was perf0rmed. Results: Thirty patients were evaluable for hypoxia PET-CT analysis, 15 per cohort. Median treatment duration was 12 days. Eleven (73.3%) atovaquone-treated patients had meaningful HV reduction, with median change -28% [95% confidence interval (CI), -58.2 to -4.4]. In contrast, median change in untreated patients was +15.5% (95% CI, -6.5 to 35.5). Linear regression estimated the expected mean HV was 55% (95% CI, 24%-74%) lower in cohort 1 compared with cohort 2 (P = 0.004), adjusting for cohort, tumor volume, and baseline HV. A key pharmacodynamics endpoint was reduction in hypoxia-regulated genes, which were significantly downregulated in atovaquone-treated tumors. Data from multiple additional measures of tumor hypoxia and perfusion are presented. No atovaquone-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions: This is the first clinical evidence that targeting tumor mitochondrial metabolism can reduce hypoxia and produce relevant antitumor effects at the mRNA level. Repurposing atovaquone for this purpose may improve treatment outcomes for NSCLC.

Background The National Prostate Cancer Audit (NPCA) reports publicly performance indicators for all hospitals in England and Wales providing radical prostate cancer treatment, identifying those with results that fall outside the ‘accepted range’ as ‘potential negative outliers’. Hospitals with outlying results are requested to provide a formal response. This ‘outlier process’, targeting a limited number of hospitals, mirrors a ‘high-risk approach’ of preventing poor quality care in contrast to a ‘population approach’ that would target all hospitals. We invited clinicians to a national workshop to learn how the outlier process contributes to quality improvement. Methods The workshop started with presentations on reducing the ‘toxicity’ of radical prostate cancer treatment. Then, clinicians from three hospitals identified as outliers shared their experience of the process and the changes in practice they had made as a result. We collected data in three ways. First, an online platform was used to gather comments from participants during the workshop. Second, a number of participants were interviewed about the outlier process as a means to improve quality of care. Third, feedback was sought after the workshop from all participants. Responses were collated and analysed for themes. Results Sixty-nine clinicians attended including urologists, oncologists, radiographers and nurses, representing a spread of hospitals across England and Wales. There were 6 interviews, 21 online comments and 31 responses after the workshop. The clinicians representing outlying hospitals highlighted the negative (stigma, work load, negative impact on reputation) and the positive impact (detailed review of procedures, implementation of targeted approaches) of the outlier process. Participants felt that sharing experiences of outlying hospitals helps others to improve. They also suggested a ‘buddy system’ between better and worse performing hospitals. Many highlighted the importance of ‘networks’ to share experiences, either good or bad, as a vehicle for improving practice. Discussion The outlier process was generally accepted as a possible mechanism to improve practice. However, participants indicated that effective dissemination is key to ensuring that identifying poor outcomes in some hospitals (e.g. high-risk approach) can stimulate country-wide quality improvement (population approach).

Background Eftilagimod alpha (efti) is a soluble LAG-3 protein that binds to a subset of MHC class II molecules to mediate antigen presenting cell (APC) and CD8 T-cell activation. The stimulation of the dendritic cell network and subsequent T cell recruitment may lead to stronger anti-tumor responses in combination with pembrolizumab than observed with pembrolizumab alone. We report results from stage 1 of all parts of the study (NCT03625323). Methods Patients (pts) with unselected PD-L1 expression were recruited into 3 cohorts: part A; 1st line, immunotherapy naïve NSCLC; part B; 2nd line, immunotherapy refractory NSCLC and part C; 2nd line immunotherapy naive HNSCC. The study uses a Simon’s 2-stage design, with objective response rate (ORR) by iRECIST as the primary endpoint (EP). Secondary EPs include tolerability, disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), PK, PD and immunogenicity. Fifty-eight (58) pts were recruited into stage 1. Up to additional 51 pts will be recruited if a pre-specified ORR threshold is met for the respective part. Efti is administered as 30 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 wks for 8 cycles and then every 3 wks for 9 cycles; pembrolizumab is administered at 200 mg intravenous infusion every 3 wks for up to 2 yrs. The study was approved by ethic committees and institutional review boards. Results Between Mar 2019 and Jul 2020 88 pts were enrolled. The median age was 67 yrs (range 53-84) and 70% were male. ECOG PS 0:1 was 42% and 58% respectively. Pts from all PD-L1 tumor expression subgroups were recruited. Pts received a median of 4 (1-25) pembrolizumab and 5.5 (1-22) efti administrations. The most common (≥ 15%) treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asthenia (28%), cough (27%), decreased appetite (22%), dyspnea (21%), fatigue (18%) and diarrhea (15%). Three (3) pts discontinued due to treatment related AEs. The ORR (acc. to iRECIST) of the 58 patients enrolled into stage 1 is shown in (table1). PK profiles after the first or repeated efti dosing were in line with previous studies, with a mean Cmax at7 ng/ml reached ≤ 24h. Circulating TH1 biomarkers 2 weeks after the last efti administration were increased (3 months vs. baseline) by a mean 61% and 209% for CXCL10 (Student paired t-test, p=0.02, n=31) and IFN-γ(p= 0.02, n=19), respectively. Conclusions Efti plus pembrolizumab is safe and shows encouraging antitumor responses in NSCLC and HNSCC patients

Background Multiple genomics-based biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibition have been reported or proposed, including tumor mutation/neoantigen frequency, PD-L1 expression, T cell receptor repertoire clonality, interferon gene signature expression, HLA expression, and others.1 Although genomics associations of response have been reported, the primary studies have used a variety of data generation and processing techniques. There is a need for data harmonization and assessment of generalizability of potential biomarkers across multiple datasets. Methods We acquired patient-level RNA sequencing FASTQ data files from 10 data sets reported in seven pan-cancer PD-1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition trials with matched clinical annotations.2–7 We applied a common bioinformatics workflow for quality control, mapping to reference (STAR), generating gene expression matrices (SALMON), T cell receptor repertoire inference (MiXCR), extraction of immune gene signatures and immune subtypes,8 and differential gene expression analysis (DESeq2). We analyzed i) immunogenomics features proposed as biomarkers, and ii) gene expression signatures built from each trial for association with overall survival across the set of trials using univariable Cox proportional hazards regression. In all, we assessed 9 total immunogenomics features/signatures. P-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Results Of the 9 immunogenomics features assessed, cytolytic activity score and expression of the Follicular Dendritic Cell Secreted Protein gene (FDCSP) were associated with survival in two of seven studies, respectively (adjusted p < 0.05) (figure 1). No proposed biomarkers were significantly associated with survival in more than two studies. The sets of genes significantly associated with clinical benefit across the studies were highly disjoint, with only three genes significant in three studies and thirteen genes significant in two studies (figure 2). No genes were significantly associated with clinical benefit in more than three of seven studies