Loading...
The completeness, accuracy and impact on alerts, of wearable vital signs monitoring in hospitalised patients
Wilson, A. J. Parker, A. J. Kitchen, G. B. Martin, A. Hughes-Noehrer, L. Nirmalan, M. Peek, N. Martin, G. P. Thistlethwaite, F. C.
Wilson, A. J.
Parker, A. J.
Kitchen, G. B.
Martin, A.
Hughes-Noehrer, L.
Nirmalan, M.
Peek, N.
Martin, G. P.
Thistlethwaite, F. C.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of wearable vital signs sensors (WVSSs) to monitor hospitalised patients is growing but uncertainty exists about how such sensors should be adopted into existing practice. The aim of this observational study was to determine the completeness of data capture and accuracy of measurements recorded by a suite of WVSSs. The implications of using such measurements to derive early warning scores was also assessed. METHODS: Adult inpatients with Covid-19 wore four WVSSs recording heart rate/respiratory rate (HR/RR), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), axillary temperature and blood pressure (BP). Wearable vitals were paired with traditional vitals (measured by nurses) recorded concurrently. The accuracy of the wearable vitals was assessed using traditional vitals as the reference. National early warning (NEWS2) scores were calculated using wearable and traditional vitals. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were monitored for 204 days with the sensors. Median sensor wear was 3.9(IQR:1.7-5.9), 3.9(IQR:1.6-5.9) and 3.8(IQR:0.9-5.9) days for HR/RR, temperature and SpO(2) respectively. The BP cuff was worn for median 1.9(IQR:0.9-3.8) days in 33 patients. Length of hospital stay was 8(IQR:6-13) days. Completeness of data capture was 84% for HR/RR, 98% for temperature, 72% for SpO(2) and 36% for BP.There were 1633 HR, 1614 RR, 1412 temperature, 1294 SpO(2) and 59 BP wearable-traditional measurement pairs. 59.7% of HR pairs were within ± 5 bpm, 38.5% of RR pairs within ± 3breaths/min, 24.4% of temperature pairs within ± 0.3℃, 32.9% of SpO(2) pairs within ± 2% and 39.0% of BP pairs within ± 10 mmHg. Agreement between wearable and traditional RRs was poor at high RRs.In a ward setting, 613 NEWS2 scores were calculated using wearable-traditional HR, RR, temperature and SpO(2) pairs. The median NEWS2(traditional) was 1(IQR:1-2) and the median NEWS2(wearable) was 4(IQR:3-6). Using traditional NEWS2 alerts as a reference, 86% (225/262) of wearable NEWS2 5 + alerts and 89% (82/92) of wearable NEWS2 7 + alerts were false positives. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between vital signs recorded by wearable sensors and concurrent traditional vitals is poor. In this context, data from wearable sensors should not be used in existing track and trigger systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The COSMIC-19 study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (registration: NCT04581031, date of registration: Oct 6th 2020). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-025-00151-x.
Description
Date
2025
Publisher
Collections
Files
Loading...
Found from Unpaywall
Adobe PDF, 1.98 MB
Keywords
Type
Article
Citation
Wilson AJ, Parker AJ, Kitchen GB, Martin A, Hughes-Noehrer L, Nirmalan M, et al. The completeness, accuracy and impact on alerts, of wearable vital signs monitoring in hospitalised patients. BMC digital health. 2025;3(1):13. PubMed PMID: 40242279. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC11997001. Epub 2025/04/17. eng.