Urinary tract obstruction and nephrostomy drainage in pelvic malignant disease.
Affiliation
Department of Urology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Withington, Manchester, UK.Issue Date
1995-11
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the survival of patients after percutaneous nephrostomy drainage (PND) for obstructive uropathy secondary to pelvic malignant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 77 patients undergoing PND for obstructive uropathy were reviewed. Patients were classified according to the nature of the obstructing lesion: Group I (primary untreated malignancy, 31 patients); Group II (recurrent malignancy with further treatment, 15 patients); Group III (recurrent malignancy with no further treatment, 12 patients); and Group IV (benign disease as a consequence of previous treatment, 19 patients). Outcome was assessed by survival over a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 2 days-8.3 years). RESULTS: Overall median survival was 26 weeks, with a 5-year survival of 22%. The survival in Groups I and II was not significantly different (median survival 27 and 20 weeks, respectively; 5-year survival, 10% and 20%, respectively). Group III patients had a poor prognosis (median survival 6.5 weeks) with no patient surviving beyond one year, whilst Group IV patients fared best with a 5-year survival of 64%. The commonest primary tumour type was carcinoma of the cervix (42 patients), and these patients were analysed as a subset. Benign post-radiation fibrosis was found in 16 of 27 patients (59%). Survival was related to the diagnostic group. CONCLUSION: The nature and extent of the obstructing lesion and its potential for further treatment are the major determinants of post-nephrostomy survival. Every effort should therefore be made to identify the nature of the obstruction before deciding on PND.Citation
Urinary tract obstruction and nephrostomy drainage in pelvic malignant disease. 1995, 76 (5):565-9 Br J UrolJournal
British Journal of UrologyDOI
10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07779PubMed ID
8535673Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
0007-1331ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07779
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Percutaneous nephrostomy for ureteric obstruction due to advanced pelvic malignancy: have we got the balance right?
- Authors: Misra S, Coker C, Richenberg J
- Issue date: 2013 Jun
- The role of percutaneous nephrostomy in malignant urinary tract obstruction.
- Authors: Watkinson AF, A'Hern RP, Jones A, King DM, Moskovic EC
- Issue date: 1993 Jan
- Factors Affecting Survival Outcome After Percutaneous Nephrostomy as Palliative Urinary Diversion in Obstructive Uropathy due to Advance Cervical Cancer Patients.
- Authors: Noegroho BS, Kurniawan AP, Wijayanti Z, Mustafa A
- Issue date: 2021 Apr 1
- Percutaneous nephrostomy: its value in obstructive uropathy complicating carcinoma of cervix uterus.
- Authors: Chan S, Robinson AC, Johnson RJ
- Issue date: 1990 May
- Self-expanding wallstent endoprosthesis for malignant ureteral obstruction.
- Authors: Díaz-Lucas EF, Martínez-Torres JL, Fernández Mena J, Carazo Martínez O, de la Fuente Serrano A, Zuluaga Gómez A
- Issue date: 1997 Dec