Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Wynter, Erika A
dc.contributor.authorCoutinho, Lucia H
dc.contributor.authorPei, X
dc.contributor.authorMarsh, J C
dc.contributor.authorHows, J
dc.contributor.authorLuft, T
dc.contributor.authorTesta, Nydia G
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-05T10:42:43Z
dc.date.available2010-05-05T10:42:43Z
dc.date.issued1995-09
dc.identifier.citationComparison of purity and enrichment of CD34+ cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord and peripheral blood (primed for apheresis) using five separation systems. 1995, 13 (5):524-32 Stem Cellsen
dc.identifier.issn1066-5099
dc.identifier.pmid8528102
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/stem.5530130510
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/97963
dc.description.abstractInterest in the isolation and characterization of primitive hemopoietic cells in both the clinical and research fields has rapidly increased. In parallel, different purification systems have been developed to isolate these cells. We have compared five different methods for separation of CD34+ cells from human umbilical cord blood, normal bone marrow and apheresis harvests and analyzed purity, recovery, yield and enrichment of colony forming cells (CFC) for each individual system. Our results indicate that the most reliable methods of purification for all samples were fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) which consistently yielded high purities (> 70%) and enrichment of CFC. In this respect the enrichment of CFC from the MACS was superior to all the other systems including FACS. Similar results (> 70%) for purity were obtained using avidin affinity columns and a biotinylated antibody but neither yield nor CFC enrichment approached the values achieved with MACS. On average CFC enrichment using these affinity columns was greater than that observed for FACS while the purity was comparable. Both CELLector flasks and immunomagnetic beads coated with CD34 antibodies were less effective in our hands in separating purified populations of progenitor cells. Both purity and CFC enrichment of CD34+ cells using these methods were at least 50% lower than obtained with either FACS, MACS or affinity columns.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectFoetal Blooden
dc.subjectHaematopoietic Stem Cellsen
dc.subject.meshAntigens, CD
dc.subject.meshAntigens, CD34
dc.subject.meshBlood Cells
dc.subject.meshBlood Component Removal
dc.subject.meshBone Marrow Cells
dc.subject.meshCell Separation
dc.subject.meshCells, Cultured
dc.subject.meshCulture Techniques
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFetal Blood
dc.subject.meshFlow Cytometry
dc.subject.meshHematopoietic Stem Cells
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshImmunomagnetic Separation
dc.subject.meshInfant, Newborn
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.titleComparison of purity and enrichment of CD34+ cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord and peripheral blood (primed for apheresis) using five separation systems.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentCancer Research Campaign Department of Experimental Haematology, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, United Kingdom.en
dc.identifier.journalStem Cellsen
html.description.abstractInterest in the isolation and characterization of primitive hemopoietic cells in both the clinical and research fields has rapidly increased. In parallel, different purification systems have been developed to isolate these cells. We have compared five different methods for separation of CD34+ cells from human umbilical cord blood, normal bone marrow and apheresis harvests and analyzed purity, recovery, yield and enrichment of colony forming cells (CFC) for each individual system. Our results indicate that the most reliable methods of purification for all samples were fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) which consistently yielded high purities (> 70%) and enrichment of CFC. In this respect the enrichment of CFC from the MACS was superior to all the other systems including FACS. Similar results (> 70%) for purity were obtained using avidin affinity columns and a biotinylated antibody but neither yield nor CFC enrichment approached the values achieved with MACS. On average CFC enrichment using these affinity columns was greater than that observed for FACS while the purity was comparable. Both CELLector flasks and immunomagnetic beads coated with CD34 antibodies were less effective in our hands in separating purified populations of progenitor cells. Both purity and CFC enrichment of CD34+ cells using these methods were at least 50% lower than obtained with either FACS, MACS or affinity columns.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record