Metastatic carcinoma of uncertain primary site: a retrospective review of 57 patients treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with cisplatin and etoposide (VAC/PE).
Affiliation
Cancer Research Campaign Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester, United Kingdom.Issue Date
1994-01-15
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Metastatic carcinoma of uncertain primary site (CUPS) is a common problem and has a poor prognosis. The intention of this study was to determine whether the addition of cisplatin and etoposide (PE) to vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (VAC) chemotherapy improves outcome. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients with an initial diagnosis of CUPS were studied. The first 40 patients had received six or 10 cycles of VAC and 17 patients VAC alternating with PE for six cycles. Review of histology using immunohistochemical techniques where appropriate was performed in all cases. RESULTS: Histologic review resulted in six tumors reclassified as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), one as hepatocarcinoma, and one as adenocarcinoma. Six of the 11 responses occurred in patients with a review diagnosis of NHL. If the six cases of NHL and the case of hepatocarcinoma were excluded, there was no difference in survival between VAC and VAC/PE treated patients. Five patients with true CUPS who responded to VAC or VAC/PE had poorly differentiated histology, and this group (n = 24) also had a significantly longer survival. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients thought to have CUPS actually have NHL, and it is this group which responds well to chemotherapy. True CUPS patients respond to chemotherapy only if the tumor is poorly differentiated; survival is significantly longer for this group of patients. An advantage for VAC/PE over VAC chemotherapy was not identified.Citation
Metastatic carcinoma of uncertain primary site: a retrospective review of 57 patients treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with cisplatin and etoposide (VAC/PE). 1994, 73 (2):470-5 CancerJournal
CancerDOI
10.1002/1097-0142(19940115)73:2<470::AID-CNCR2820730236>3.0.CO;2-7PubMed ID
8293415Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
0008-543Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/1097-0142(19940115)73:2<470::AID-CNCR2820730236>3.0.CO;2-7
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Prognostic factors in surgically treated small cell cervical carcinoma followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.
- Authors: Chang TC, Lai CH, Tseng CJ, Hsueh S, Huang KG, Chou HH
- Issue date: 1998 Aug 15
- Treatment of limited small-cell lung cancer with etoposide and cisplatin alternating with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus concurrent etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide and chest radiotherapy: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.
- Authors: Goodman GE, Crowley JJ, Blasko JC, Livingston RB, Beck TM, Demattia MD, Bukowski RM
- Issue date: 1990 Jan
- Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer.
- Authors: Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N, Nishiwaki Y, Ikegami H, Tamura T, Shimoyama M, Suemasu K
- Issue date: 1991 Jun 19
- Etoposide/cisplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with metastatic poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site.
- Authors: Greco FA, Johnson DH, Hainsworth JD
- Issue date: 1992 Dec
- Multimodality therapy in early-stage neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
- Authors: Boruta DM 2nd, Schorge JO, Duska LA, Crum CP, Castrillon DH, Sheets EE
- Issue date: 2001 Apr