Improving quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: research experience with gemcitabine.
Affiliation
CRC Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, U.K.Issue Date
1997-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Alongside objective response rate, quality of life of patients is important in the treatment of cancer, particularly in the palliative setting. Quality of life is difficult to define precisely and is correspondingly difficult to assess. However, a number of methods have been devised and self-report questionnaires are now widely used. Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis with few patients surviving longer than 8 or 9 months. Curative treatment is often not possible and few patients receive active treatment. Although some patients will accept toxic treatments in return for increased survival, it is generally hoped that any treatment, curative or palliative, will not adversely affect patients' quality of life. In three studies in which gemcitabine was used as a single agent in metastatic NSCLC, objective response rates of 20% were obtained. Gemcitabine was well tolerated. Symptoms improved in the studies where disease-related symptoms were assessed. The degree of improvement compared well with historical data on the relief offered by standard radiotherapy and combination chemotherapy. These findings have led to the initiation of a randomised trial to compare the relief offered by gemcitabine plus best supportive care with best supportive care, using quality of life assessments as a primary endpoint.Citation
Improving quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: research experience with gemcitabine. 1997, 33 Suppl 1:S8-13 Eur. J. CancerJournal
European Journal of CancerDOI
10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00336-XPubMed ID
9166093Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
0959-8049ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00336-X
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.
- Authors: Clegg A, Scott DA, Sidhu M, Hewitson P, Waugh N
- Issue date: 2001
- Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer--a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
- Authors: Anderson H, Hopwood P, Stephens RJ, Thatcher N, Cottier B, Nicholson M, Milroy R, Maughan TS, Falk SJ, Bond MG, Burt PA, Connolly CK, McIllmurray MB, Carmichael J
- Issue date: 2000 Aug
- Gemcitabine. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
- Authors: Noble S, Goa KL
- Issue date: 1997 Sep
- The use of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer. Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.
- Authors: Evans WK, Kocha W, Gagliardi A, Eady A, Newman TE
- Issue date: 1999 Feb
- Single-agent gemcitabine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II trial.
- Authors: Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C, Rossi A, Barletta E, Barzelloni ML, Creazzola S, Gatani T, Fiore F, Guida C, Scognamiglio F
- Issue date: 1999 Sep-Oct