Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCooper, Rachel A
dc.contributor.authorCowan, Richard A
dc.contributor.authorOwens, Susan E
dc.contributor.authorJeans, Steve
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Jacqueline K
dc.contributor.authorHillel, Philip G
dc.contributor.authorSlevin, Nicholas J
dc.contributor.authorAllan, Ernest
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Nirmal K
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Conor D
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-14T15:35:45Z
dc.date.available2009-12-14T15:35:45Z
dc.date.issued1999-03
dc.identifier.citationDoes salivary gland scintigraphy predict response to pilocarpine in patients with post-radiotherapy xerostomia? 1999, 26 (3):220-5 Eur J Nucl Meden
dc.identifier.issn0340-6997
dc.identifier.pmid10079311
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s002590050380
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/87904
dc.description.abstractThis study was undertaken to determine whether standard salivary gland scintigraphy may be used for the objective assessment of salivary gland sialogogues, in particular oral pilocarpine, in the treatment of post-radiotherapy xerostomia. Nine patients, with xerostomia following radiotherapy to the head and neck region underwent salivary gland scintigraphy with technetium-99m pertechnetate (40 MBq) both before and following 1 month of oral pilocarpine (5 mg tds). For each scan, the percentage uptake in the first 14 min, the peak uptake, time to peak uptake and the percentage of activity excreted following lemon juice stimulation were calculated. The results were correlated with the subjective response as assessed by questionnaire and visual analogue scale. We found no correlation between subjective response and any of the four scan parameters analysed. We could not identify any parameter that predicted those patients who would respond to pilocarpine. In addition, only one parameter, the percentage of activity excreted following stimulation, correlated with previous dose of radiotherapy to the gland. In conclusion, in this study salivary gland scintigraphy did not appear to correlate with or predict response to oral pilocarpine. However, future studies might consider performing salivary gland scintigraphy prior to radiotherapy as well as at differing time points following the commencement of pilocarpine.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectHead and Neck Canceren
dc.subject.meshAdministration, Oral
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Squamous Cell
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHead and Neck Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshParasympathomimetics
dc.subject.meshPilocarpine
dc.subject.meshPilot Projects
dc.subject.meshPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subject.meshRadiopharmaceuticals
dc.subject.meshSalivary Glands
dc.subject.meshSodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m
dc.subject.meshXerostomia
dc.titleDoes salivary gland scintigraphy predict response to pilocarpine in patients with post-radiotherapy xerostomia?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicineen
html.description.abstractThis study was undertaken to determine whether standard salivary gland scintigraphy may be used for the objective assessment of salivary gland sialogogues, in particular oral pilocarpine, in the treatment of post-radiotherapy xerostomia. Nine patients, with xerostomia following radiotherapy to the head and neck region underwent salivary gland scintigraphy with technetium-99m pertechnetate (40 MBq) both before and following 1 month of oral pilocarpine (5 mg tds). For each scan, the percentage uptake in the first 14 min, the peak uptake, time to peak uptake and the percentage of activity excreted following lemon juice stimulation were calculated. The results were correlated with the subjective response as assessed by questionnaire and visual analogue scale. We found no correlation between subjective response and any of the four scan parameters analysed. We could not identify any parameter that predicted those patients who would respond to pilocarpine. In addition, only one parameter, the percentage of activity excreted following stimulation, correlated with previous dose of radiotherapy to the gland. In conclusion, in this study salivary gland scintigraphy did not appear to correlate with or predict response to oral pilocarpine. However, future studies might consider performing salivary gland scintigraphy prior to radiotherapy as well as at differing time points following the commencement of pilocarpine.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record