A macropencil beam model: clinical implementation for conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Affiliation
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle 98195-6043, USA.Issue Date
1999-04
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The increasing use of irregularly shaped, off-centre fields in advanced treatment techniques, particularly intensity modulated radiation therapy, has strained the limits of conventional, broad-beam dose calculation algorithms. More recent models, such as kernel-based pencil beams and Monte Carlo methods, are accurate but suffer from the time needed for calculations and from the lack of clearly established methods for determining the parameters needed to match calculations with the particular dosimetric characteristics of an individual machine. This paper presents the implementation of a model that uses an extended source model to calculate the variation of fluence at the patient surface for any arbitrarily shaped field. It uses a macropencil beam model to calculate phantom scatter. Both head scatter and phantom scatter models use exponential functions fit to a series of measurements to determine the model's parameters. The means by which the model can be implemented in a clinical setting using standard dosimetric equipment is presented. Results for two separate machines and three energies are presented. Comparisons with measurements for a set of regular and irregular fields demonstrate the accuracy of the model for conventional, conformal and intensity modulated treatments. For rectangular and irregular fields at depths up to 20 cm, the accuracy was better than < or =1.5%, compared with errors of up to 7.5% with a standard algorithm. For a 20-step intensity modulated field, the accuracy was 3.4% compared with 18% with the conventional algorithm. The advantages of this model for IMRT are discussed.Citation
A macropencil beam model: clinical implementation for conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy. 1999, 44 (4):1067-88 Phys Med BiolJournal
Physics in Medicine and BiologyDOI
10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/018PubMed ID
10232815Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
0031-9155ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/018
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
- Authors: Francescon P, Cora S, Chiovati P
- Issue date: 2003 Feb
- Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
- Authors: Shirey RJ, Wu HT
- Issue date: 2018 Jan
- On empirical methods to determine scatter factors for irregular MLC shaped beams.
- Authors: Georg D, Olofsson J, Künzler T, Karlsson M
- Issue date: 2004 Aug
- Comparison of analytic source models for head scatter factor calculation and planar dose calculation for IMRT.
- Authors: Yan G, Liu C, Lu B, Palta JR, Li JG
- Issue date: 2008 Apr 21
- Pixel response-based EPID dosimetry for patient specific QA.
- Authors: Han B, Ding A, Lu M, Xing L
- Issue date: 2017 Jan