• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    A macropencil beam model: clinical implementation for conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Phillips, Mark H
    Singer, Karen M
    Hounsell, Alan R
    Affiliation
    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle 98195-6043, USA.
    Issue Date
    1999-04
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The increasing use of irregularly shaped, off-centre fields in advanced treatment techniques, particularly intensity modulated radiation therapy, has strained the limits of conventional, broad-beam dose calculation algorithms. More recent models, such as kernel-based pencil beams and Monte Carlo methods, are accurate but suffer from the time needed for calculations and from the lack of clearly established methods for determining the parameters needed to match calculations with the particular dosimetric characteristics of an individual machine. This paper presents the implementation of a model that uses an extended source model to calculate the variation of fluence at the patient surface for any arbitrarily shaped field. It uses a macropencil beam model to calculate phantom scatter. Both head scatter and phantom scatter models use exponential functions fit to a series of measurements to determine the model's parameters. The means by which the model can be implemented in a clinical setting using standard dosimetric equipment is presented. Results for two separate machines and three energies are presented. Comparisons with measurements for a set of regular and irregular fields demonstrate the accuracy of the model for conventional, conformal and intensity modulated treatments. For rectangular and irregular fields at depths up to 20 cm, the accuracy was better than < or =1.5%, compared with errors of up to 7.5% with a standard algorithm. For a 20-step intensity modulated field, the accuracy was 3.4% compared with 18% with the conventional algorithm. The advantages of this model for IMRT are discussed.
    Citation
    A macropencil beam model: clinical implementation for conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy. 1999, 44 (4):1067-88 Phys Med Biol
    Journal
    Physics in Medicine and Biology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/87890
    DOI
    10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/018
    PubMed ID
    10232815
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0031-9155
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/018
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
    • Authors: Francescon P, Cora S, Chiovati P
    • Issue date: 2003 Feb
    • Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
    • Authors: Shirey RJ, Wu HT
    • Issue date: 2018 Jan
    • On empirical methods to determine scatter factors for irregular MLC shaped beams.
    • Authors: Georg D, Olofsson J, Künzler T, Karlsson M
    • Issue date: 2004 Aug
    • Comparison of analytic source models for head scatter factor calculation and planar dose calculation for IMRT.
    • Authors: Yan G, Liu C, Lu B, Palta JR, Li JG
    • Issue date: 2008 Apr 21
    • Pixel response-based EPID dosimetry for patient specific QA.
    • Authors: Han B, Ding A, Lu M, Xing L
    • Issue date: 2017 Jan
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.