The effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: results of two meta-analyses.
AffiliationCAA Bristol Oncology Centre, UK.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe findings of two meta-analyses of trials of psychological interventions in patients with cancer are presented: the first using anxiety and the second depression, as a main outcome measure. The majority of the trials were preventative, selecting subjects on the basis of a cancer diagnosis rather than on psychological criteria. For anxiety, 25 trials were identified and six were excluded because of missing data. The remaining 19 trials (including five unpublished) had a combined effect size of 0.42 standard deviations in favour of treatment against no-treatment controls (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.74, total sample size 1023). A most robust estimate is 0.36 which is based on a subset of trials which were randomized, scored well on a rating of study quality, had a sample size > 40 and in which the effect of trials with very large effects were cancelled out. For depression, 30 trials were identified, but ten were excluded because of missing data. The remaining 20 trials (including six unpublished) had a combined effect size of 0.36 standard deviations in favour of treatment against no-treatment controls (95% CI 0.06-0.66, sample size 1101). This estimate was robust for publication bias, but not study quality, and was inflated by three trials with very large effects. A more robust estimate of mean effect is the clinically weak to negligible value of 0.19. Group therapy is at least as effective as individual. Only four trials targeted interventions at those identified as at risk of, or suffering significant psychological distress, these were associated with clinically powerful effects (trend) relative to unscreened subjects. The findings suggest that preventative psychological interventions in cancer patients may have a moderate clinical effect upon anxiety but not depression. There are indications that interventions targeted at those at risk of or suffering significant psychological distress have strong clinical effects. Evidence on the effectiveness of such targeted interventions and of the feasibility and effects of group therapy in a European context is required.
CitationThe effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: results of two meta-analyses. 1999, 80 (11):1770-80 Br. J. Cancer
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
- Prevention of suicide and attempted suicide in Denmark. Epidemiological studies of suicide and intervention studies in selected risk groups.
- Authors: Nordentoft M
- Issue date: 2007 Nov
- Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of parenting programmes in improving maternal psychosocial health.
- Authors: Barlow J, Coren E, Stewart-Brown S
- Issue date: 2002 Mar
- Mind and cancer: does psychosocial intervention improve survival and psychological well-being?
- Authors: Ross L, Boesen EH, Dalton SO, Johansen C
- Issue date: 2002 Jul
- Psychological treatment of late-life depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Authors: Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Smit F
- Issue date: 2006 Dec
- Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
- Authors: Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G
- Issue date: 2001