Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSydes, Matthew R
dc.contributor.authorParmar, Mahesh K B
dc.contributor.authorJames, Nicholas D
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Noel W
dc.contributor.authorDearnaley, David P
dc.contributor.authorMason, Malcolm D
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Rachel C
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Karen
dc.contributor.authorRoyston, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-05T10:38:39Z
dc.date.available2009-11-05T10:38:39Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationIssues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial. 2009, 10:39 Trialsen
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.pmid19519885
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1745-6215-10-39
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/85397
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) trial is a new paradigm for conducting randomised controlled trials that allows the simultaneous assessment of a number of research treatments against a single control arm. MAMS trials provide earlier answers and are potentially more cost-effective than a series of traditionally designed trials. Prostate cancer is the most common tumour in men and there is a need to improve outcomes for men with hormone-sensitive, advanced disease as quickly as possible. The MAMS design will potentially facilitate evaluation and testing of new therapies in this and other diseases. METHODS: STAMPEDE is an open-label, 5-stage, 6-arm randomised controlled trial using MAMS methodology for men with prostate cancer. It is the first trial of this design to use multiple arms and stages synchronously. RESULTS: The practical and statistical issues faced by STAMPEDE in implementing MAMS methodology are discussed and contrasted with those for traditional trials. These issues include the choice of intermediate and final outcome measures, sample size calculations and the impact of varying the assumptions, the process for moving between trial stages, stopping accrual to each trial arm and overall, and issues around perceived trial complexity. CONCLUSION: It is possible to use the MAMS design to initiate and undertake large scale cancer trials. The results from STAMPEDE will not be known for some years but the lessons learned from running a MAMS trial are shared in the hope that other researchers will use this exciting and efficient method to perform further randomised controlled trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN78818544, NCT00268476.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectProstatic Canceren
dc.subject.meshAndrogen Antagonists
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subject.meshData Interpretation, Statistical
dc.subject.meshDiphosphonates
dc.subject.meshDrug Therapy, Combination
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshImidazoles
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshProstatic Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subject.meshSoftware
dc.subject.meshTaxoids
dc.titleIssues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentMRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK. matthew.sydes@ctu.mrc.ac.uken
dc.identifier.journalTrialsen
html.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) trial is a new paradigm for conducting randomised controlled trials that allows the simultaneous assessment of a number of research treatments against a single control arm. MAMS trials provide earlier answers and are potentially more cost-effective than a series of traditionally designed trials. Prostate cancer is the most common tumour in men and there is a need to improve outcomes for men with hormone-sensitive, advanced disease as quickly as possible. The MAMS design will potentially facilitate evaluation and testing of new therapies in this and other diseases. METHODS: STAMPEDE is an open-label, 5-stage, 6-arm randomised controlled trial using MAMS methodology for men with prostate cancer. It is the first trial of this design to use multiple arms and stages synchronously. RESULTS: The practical and statistical issues faced by STAMPEDE in implementing MAMS methodology are discussed and contrasted with those for traditional trials. These issues include the choice of intermediate and final outcome measures, sample size calculations and the impact of varying the assumptions, the process for moving between trial stages, stopping accrual to each trial arm and overall, and issues around perceived trial complexity. CONCLUSION: It is possible to use the MAMS design to initiate and undertake large scale cancer trials. The results from STAMPEDE will not be known for some years but the lessons learned from running a MAMS trial are shared in the hope that other researchers will use this exciting and efficient method to perform further randomised controlled trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN78818544, NCT00268476.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record