Repeated ultraviolet exposure affords the same protection against DNA photodamage and erythema in human skin types II and IV but is associated with faster DNA repair in skin type IV.
Affiliation
Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hopsital, Masnchester M20 4BX, UKIssue Date
2002-05
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We have investigated the photoprotective properties of induced pigmentation using erythema and epidermal DNA photodamage as endpoints. Previously unexposed buttock skin of 12 young, healthy adults (six skin type II and six skin type IV) was exposed daily (Monday to Friday) for 2 wk (days 1-12) with 0.65 minimal erythema dose of solar simulated radiation. Mean skin type IV minimal erythema dose was 1.8-fold greater than for skin type II. Compared to skin type II, solar simulated radiation treatments produced less erythema and more tanning in skin type IV. To assess DNA photodamage, biopsies were taken and prepared for paraffin sections that were stained with a monoclonal antibody for thymine dimers. Thymine dimers were quantified by image analysis. The single exposure data (0.65 and 2 minimal erythema dose) showed that DNA damage was related to physical dose (J per cm2) independent of skin type. Our data also showed that DNA photodamage accumulates in both skin types with repeated, suberythemal doses of solar simulated radiation. On day 12, there were more thymine dimers in skin type IV than skin type II, again indicating that physical rather than biologic dose determines the level of DNA damage. Comparisons on days 12 and 19, however, showed a much greater loss of thymine dimers in skin type IV, suggesting better thymine dimer repair. Protection factors for erythema and thymine dimers were calculated and shown to be about 2 in both skin types. This provides further indirect evidence that DNA is a chromophore for erythema, but also suggests that a tan may not be the major factor in natural photoprotection.Citation
Repeated ultraviolet exposure affords the same protection against DNA photodamage and erythema in human skin types II and IV but is associated with faster DNA repair in skin type IV. 2002, 118 (5):825-9 J. Invest. Dermatol.Journal
The Journal of Investigative DermatologyDOI
10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01681.xPubMed ID
11982760Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
0022-202Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01681.x
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- The similarity of action spectra for thymine dimers in human epidermis and erythema suggests that DNA is the chromophore for erythema.
- Authors: Young AR, Chadwick CA, Harrison GI, Nikaido O, Ramsden J, Potten CS
- Issue date: 1998 Dec
- Protection by ultraviolet A and B sunscreens against in situ dipyrimidine photolesions in human epidermis is comparable to protection against sunburn.
- Authors: Young AR, Sheehan JM, Chadwick CA, Potten CS
- Issue date: 2000 Jul
- Increased cyclooxygenase expression and thymine dimer formation after repeated exposures of humans to low doses of solar simulated radiation.
- Authors: Narbutt J, Lesiak A, Jochymski C, Kozlowski W, Sysa-Jedrzejowska A, Norval M
- Issue date: 2007 Oct
- Repeated low-dose ultraviolet (UV) B exposures of humans induce limited photoprotection against the immune effects of erythemal UVB radiation.
- Authors: Narbutt J, Lesiak A, Sysa-Jedrzejowska A, Wozniacka A, Cierniewska-Cieslak A, Boncela J, Jochymski C, Kozlowski W, Zalewska A, Skibinska M, Norval M
- Issue date: 2007 Mar
- Protection against pyrimidine dimers, p53, and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine expression in ultraviolet-irradiated human skin by sunscreens: difference between UVB + UVA and UVB alone sunscreens.
- Authors: Liardet S, Scaletta C, Panizzon R, Hohlfeld P, Laurent-Applegate L
- Issue date: 2001 Dec