Marriott, Andrew S
Lawrance, Jeremy A L
Johnson, Richard J
Lee, S H
England, R E
Gamble, G E
Martin, D F
AffiliationAcademic Department of GI-Radiology, South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Central Lancashire, Manchester, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractAIM: To compare percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) and assess a hybrid gastrostomy technique (per-oral image-guided gastrostomy, PIG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty PEGs and 50 RIGs performed in three centres were prospectively compared and the endoscopic findings of 200 PEGs reviewed. A fluoroscopy-guided technique was modified to place 20 F over-the-wire PEG-tubes in 60 consecutive patients. RESULTS: Technical success was 98%, 100% and 100% for PEG, RIG and PIG, respectively. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced stoma infection for orally placed tubes (p=0.02). Ten out of 50 (20%) small-bore RIG tubes blocked. Replacement tubes were required in six out of 50 PEGs (12%), 10 out of 50 RIGs (20%), but no PIGs (p<0.001). No procedure-related complications occurred. The function of radiologically placed tubes was significantly improved with the larger PIG (p<0.001), with similar wound infection rates. PIG was successful in 24 patients where endoscopic insertion could not be performed. Significant endoscopic abnormalities were found in 42 out of 200 PEG patients (21%), all related to peptic disease. Insignificant pathology was found in 8.5%. CONCLUSION: PIG combines advantages of both traditional methods with a higher success and lower re-intervention rate. Endoscopy is unlikely to detect clinically relevant pathology other than peptic disease. PIG is a very effective gastrostomy method; it has better long-term results than RIG and is successful where conventional PEG has failed.
CitationGastrostomy insertion: comparing the options--PEG, RIG or PIG? 2003, 58 (5):398-405 Clin Radiol
- Outcomes of radiologically inserted gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
- Authors: Cherian P, Blake C, Appleyard M, Clouston J, Mott N
- Issue date: 2019 Oct
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG): A comparison of outcomes at an Australian teaching hospital.
- Authors: Vidhya C, Phoebe D, Dhina C, Jayne S, Robert F
- Issue date: 2018 Feb
- Percutaneous endoscopic, radiological and surgical gastrostomy tubes: a comparison study in head and neck cancer patients.
- Authors: Rustom IK, Jebreel A, Tayyab M, England RJ, Stafford ND
- Issue date: 2006 Jun
- Gastrostomy insertion in head and neck cancer patients: a 3 year review of insertion method and complication rates.
- Authors: McAllister P, MacIver C, Wales C, McMahon J, Devine JC, McHattie G, Makubate B
- Issue date: 2013 Dec
- Radiologic gastrojejunostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized comparison.
- Authors: Hoffer EK, Cosgrove JM, Levin DQ, Herskowitz MM, Sclafani SJ
- Issue date: 1999 Apr