Do women understand the odds? Risk perceptions and recall of risk information in women with a family history of breast cancer.
Affiliation
Psycho-Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK. penny.hopwood@christie-tr.nwest.nhs.ukIssue Date
2003
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare women's risk perceptions and recall of breast cancer risk information in a cohort of first-time attendees at a family history clinic. METHODS: We conducted a 1-year prospective study of 158 women aged 18-45 years with a confirmed lifetime risk of breast cancer of 1 in 6 or greater. Risk perception and recall were assessed using a self-report questionnaire, completed pre-counselling and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-counselling, and through interviews conducted at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: The proportion of women with accurate personal risk perceptions based on 'gambling' odds ('1 chance in x') significantly improved after risk counselling from 12% pre-counselling to 67% 3 months post-counselling (p < 0.001), which was maintained for 1 year. This was the method of reporting perceived risk associated with the best level of risk accuracy and the women's preferred format for describing risk, but the concept of lifetime risk was understood by only 44% of women. Qualitative risk categories ('high', moderate' or 'low') correlated significantly with women's self-reported odds values, but each category comprised a wide range of women's perceived numeric risks. Describing risk as the 'likelihood of breast cancer' resulted in a broad and somewhat inaccurate reporting of risk, compared with numeric ratings made at the same time. There was an increase of up to 4-fold in the proportion of women who failed to recall their risk value over time, and women were unable to accurately put the breast cancer risk in context compared with other health threats. CONCLUSIONS: All methods of describing risk have limitations, but the results of the present study provide good support for women's accurate recall of numeric risk values and their preference for use of these 'gambling' odds. This may have been influenced by consistency of the use of this method both in risk communication and in personal summary letters. Descriptive risk formats reflected higher levels of perceived vulnerability to breast cancer, and genetic counsellors need to be aware of these different perceptions.Citation
Do women understand the odds? Risk perceptions and recall of risk information in women with a family history of breast cancer. 2003, 6 (4):214-23 Community GenetJournal
Community GeneticsDOI
10.1159/000079383PubMed ID
15331867Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1422-2795ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1159/000079383
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer.
- Authors: Watson M, Lloyd S, Davidson J, Meyer L, Eeles R, Ebbs S, Murday V
- Issue date: 1999 Feb
- Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?
- Authors: Watson M, Duvivier V, Wade Walsh M, Ashley S, Davidson J, Papaikonomou M, Murday V, Sacks N, Eeles R
- Issue date: 1998 Sep
- Women's need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire, interview, and observational study.
- Authors: Hallowell N, Murton F, Statham H, Green JM, Richards MP
- Issue date: 1997 Jan 25
- Communicating breast cancer risks to women using different formats.
- Authors: Lipkus IM, Klein WM, Rimer BK
- Issue date: 2001 Aug
- Counselee participation in follow-up breast cancer genetic counselling visits and associations with achievement of the preferred role, cognitive outcomes, risk perception alignment and perceived personal control.
- Authors: Albada A, Ausems MG, van Dulmen S
- Issue date: 2014 Sep