Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWatson, M
dc.contributor.authorFoster, C
dc.contributor.authorEeles, Rosalind
dc.contributor.authorEccles, D
dc.contributor.authorAshley, Sue
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, R
dc.contributor.authorMackay, J
dc.contributor.authorMorrison, P J
dc.contributor.authorHopwood, Penelope
dc.contributor.authorEvans, D Gareth R
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-19T13:46:31Z
dc.date.available2009-08-19T13:46:31Z
dc.date.issued2004-11-15
dc.identifier.citationPsychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort. 2004, 91 (10):1787-94 Br. J. Canceren
dc.identifier.issn0007-0920
dc.identifier.pmid15505627
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/77858
dc.description.abstractThis multi-centre UK study assesses the impact of predictive testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1/2) in the clinical context. In the year following predictive testing, 261 adults (59 male) from nine UK genetics centres participated; 91 gene mutation carriers and 170 noncarriers. Self-report questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-genetic testing) and 1, 4 and 12 months following the genetic test result. Men were assessed for general mental health (by general health questionnaire (GHQ)) and women for general mental health, cancer-related worry, intrusive and avoidant thoughts, perception of risk and risk management behaviour. Main comparisons were between female carriers and noncarriers on all measures and men and women for general mental health. Female noncarriers benefited psychologically, with significant reductions in cancer-related worry following testing (P<0.001). However, younger female carriers (<50 years) showed a rise in cancer-related worry 1 month post-testing (P<0.05). This returned to pre-testing baseline levels 12 months later, but worry remained significantly higher than noncarriers throughout (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in GHQ scores between males and females (both carriers and noncarriers) at any time point. Female carriers engaged in significantly more risk management strategies than noncarriers in the year following testing (e.g. mammograms; 92% carriers vs 30% noncarriers). In the 12 months post-testing, 28% carriers had bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and 31% oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was confined to older (mean 41 yrs) women who already had children. However, worry about cancer was not assuaged by surgery following genetic testing, and this requires further investigation. In all, 20% of female carriers reported insurance problems. The data show persistent worry in younger female gene carriers and confirm changes in risk management consistent with carrier status. Men were not adversely affected by genetic testing in terms of their general mental health.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBreast Canceren
dc.subjectOvarian Canceren
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAge Factors
dc.subject.meshAnxiety
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshCohort Studies
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshGenes, BRCA1
dc.subject.meshGenes, BRCA2
dc.subject.meshGenetic Predisposition to Disease
dc.subject.meshGenetic Screening
dc.subject.meshGreat Britain
dc.subject.meshHeterozygote
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshInsurance Selection Bias
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshMutation
dc.subject.meshOvarian Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshQuestionnaires
dc.subject.meshRisk Management
dc.subject.meshSex Factors
dc.titlePsychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London & Sutton, SM2 5PT, England. Maggie.Watson@rmh.nthames.nhs.uken
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of Canceren
html.description.abstractThis multi-centre UK study assesses the impact of predictive testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1/2) in the clinical context. In the year following predictive testing, 261 adults (59 male) from nine UK genetics centres participated; 91 gene mutation carriers and 170 noncarriers. Self-report questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-genetic testing) and 1, 4 and 12 months following the genetic test result. Men were assessed for general mental health (by general health questionnaire (GHQ)) and women for general mental health, cancer-related worry, intrusive and avoidant thoughts, perception of risk and risk management behaviour. Main comparisons were between female carriers and noncarriers on all measures and men and women for general mental health. Female noncarriers benefited psychologically, with significant reductions in cancer-related worry following testing (P<0.001). However, younger female carriers (<50 years) showed a rise in cancer-related worry 1 month post-testing (P<0.05). This returned to pre-testing baseline levels 12 months later, but worry remained significantly higher than noncarriers throughout (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in GHQ scores between males and females (both carriers and noncarriers) at any time point. Female carriers engaged in significantly more risk management strategies than noncarriers in the year following testing (e.g. mammograms; 92% carriers vs 30% noncarriers). In the 12 months post-testing, 28% carriers had bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and 31% oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was confined to older (mean 41 yrs) women who already had children. However, worry about cancer was not assuaged by surgery following genetic testing, and this requires further investigation. In all, 20% of female carriers reported insurance problems. The data show persistent worry in younger female gene carriers and confirm changes in risk management consistent with carrier status. Men were not adversely affected by genetic testing in terms of their general mental health.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record