Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review.
AffiliationDepartment of Histopathology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe autopsy is in decline, despite the fact that accurate mortality statistics remain essential for public health and health service planning. The falling autopsy rate combined with the Coroners Review and Human Tissue Act have contributed to this decline, and to a falling use of autopsy histology, with potential impact on clinical audit and mortality statistics. At a time when the need for reform and improvement in the death certification process is so prominent, we felt it important to assess the value of the autopsy and autopsy histology. We carried out a meta-analysis of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses and the contribution of autopsy histology. There has been little improvement in the overall rate of discrepancies between the 1960s and the present. At least a third of death certificates are likely to be incorrect and 50% of autopsies produce findings unsuspected before death. In addition, the cases which give rise to discrepancies cannot be identified prior to autopsy. Over 20% of clinically unexpected autopsy findings, including 5% of major findings, can be correctly diagnosed only by histological examination. Although the autopsy and particularly autopsy histology are being undermined, they are still the most accurate method of determining the cause of death and auditing accuracy of clinical diagnosis, diagnostic tests and death certification.
CitationDiscrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. 2005, 47 (6):551-9 Histopathology
- Medical certification of causes of death in an Australian metropolitan hospital. Comparison with autopsy findings and a critical review.
- Authors: McKelvie PA
- Issue date: 1993 Jun 21
- A retrospective study of the accuracy between clinical and autopsy cause of death in the University of Malaya Medical Centre.
- Authors: Ong BB, Wong JJ, Hashim J
- Issue date: 2004 Jun
- Minimizing mistakes in clinical diagnosis.
- Authors: Ermenc B
- Issue date: 1999 Jul
- Use of the autopsy in Northern Ireland and its value in perioperative deaths.
- Authors: Shanks JH, Anderson NH, McCluggage G, Toner PG
- Issue date: 1991
- Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.
- Authors: Pastores SM, Dulu A, Voigt L, Raoof N, Alicea M, Halpern NA
- Issue date: 2007