AffiliationCRUK Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractAromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been in use to treat metastatic breast cancer for over 25 years. Recently potent and specific AIs have been introduced, which, because of their low toxicity profile, are being used in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant situation and also for the prevention of breast cancer. The two non-steroidal AIs, anastrozole and letrozole, and the steroidal AI, exemestane, have all shown superiority to tamoxifen as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Interestingly, the oestrogen receptor downregulator, fulvestrant, was shown to be equivalent to anastrozole when compared as second-line therapy after the failure of tamoxifen. The first adjuvant AI trial began in 1996 and recruited over 9000 patients (ATAC trial). Anastrozole was compared with tamoxifen and a combination of the two drugs. There were no significant differences between tamoxifen and the combination. However, anastrozole showed about a 20% improvement in disease-free survival in ER+ disease compared with the other treatments. An overall survival analysis will be reported later this year. Two trials have compared 5 years of tamoxifen with 2-3 years of tamoxifen, followed by 2-3 years of AI (one trial (ITA) used anastrozole and another (intergroup) exemestane). Both trials show a disease-free advantage for the switch to AI. In another study (MA17) 5 years of tamoxifen was followed by a randomisation to letrozole or placebo and showed a significant disease-free advantage to the AI. Both letrozole and anastrozole show superiority to tamoxifen when used as a neoadjuvant therapy. Anastrozole significantly reduced contralateral breast cancer compared with tamoxifen, and this has led to two prevention trials: one in women at risk comparing anastrozole with placebo and the other after excision of DCIS comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen (IBIS II). The NCI Canada has also just initiated a trial of exemestane for prevention. Nearly all data available indicate that AIs are superior to tamoxifen. The important question is whether survival is improved when they are used as adjuvant therapy?
CitationAre aromatase inhibitors superior to antiestrogens? 2005, 93 (2-5):237-47 J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
JournalThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Where do selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) now fit into breast cancer treatment algorithms?
- Authors: Howell A, Howell SJ, Clarke R, Anderson E
- Issue date: 2001 Dec
- Are all aromatase inhibitors the same? A review of controlled clinical trials in breast cancer.
- Authors: Berry J
- Issue date: 2005 Nov
- Emerging role of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting.
- Authors: Goss PE
- Issue date: 2003 Aug
- Endocrine therapy trials of aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer in the adjuvant and prevention settings.
- Authors: Ingle JN
- Issue date: 2005 Jan 15
- Adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors: determining the future landscape of adjuvant endocrine therapy.
- Authors: Ragaz J
- Issue date: 2001 Dec