• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Patient participation in decision making: views of health professionals caring for people with colorectal cancer.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Beaver, Kinta
    Craven, Olive
    Witham, Gary
    Tomlinson, Mary
    Susnerwala, Shabbir
    Jones, David R
    Luker, Karen
    Affiliation
    School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. kinta.beaver@manchester.ac.uk
    Issue Date
    2007-04
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    AIM: The aim of this study was to explore views on patient participation in decision making, as described by health professionals caring for people with colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Patient participation in health-care decision making is on the policy agenda at an international level. However, many aspects of cancer care and treatment are complex and it is unclear how health professionals view their role as promoters of patient participation. DESIGN: A qualitative exploratory study. METHODS: In depth interviews with 35 health professionals in clinical practice. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis, assisted by a computer software package for analysis of qualitative data (N-VIVO). RESULTS: Choices in relation to surgical treatment were viewed as limited. Although it was perceived that patients could be more involved in decisions related to adjuvant treatment, providing information on various chemotherapy regimes was challenging. It was acknowledged that patients could be involved in treatment choices but there was far less clarity concerning aspects of physical and psychological care. Age was a factor when determining which patients should be offered treatment choices. CONCLUSION: The availability and presentation of choices to patients is context specific and tailored to the preferences of individuals. If health professionals focus only on aspects of decision making related to treatment, the potential for shared partnerships with patients in relation to choices about physical and psychological care may be lost. This may be particularly pertinent for nurses and allied professions who engage with patients throughout the illness trajectory. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Policy makers should arguably appreciate that health professionals have an awareness of current thinking on patient participation, but may find policy recommendations challenging to implement in clinical practice when faced with the individual needs and preferences of patients and the complexities and uncertainties of disease management.
    Citation
    Patient participation in decision making: views of health professionals caring for people with colorectal cancer. 2007, 16 (4):725-33 J Clin Nurs
    Journal
    Journal of Clinical Nursing
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/72877
    DOI
    10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01587.x
    PubMed ID
    17402954
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0962-1067
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01587.x
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer.
    • Authors: Beaver K, Jones D, Susnerwala S, Craven O, Tomlinson M, Witham G, Luker KA
    • Issue date: 2005 Jun
    • Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.
    • Authors: Rees S, Williams A
    • Issue date: 2009
    • User participation in a Municipal Acute Ward in Norway: dilemmas in the interface between policy ideals and work conditions.
    • Authors: Johannessen AK, Tveiten S, Werner A
    • Issue date: 2018 Jun
    • Involvement of people with schizophrenia in decision-making in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study.
    • Authors: Souraya S, Hanlon C, Asher L
    • Issue date: 2018 Aug 22
    • Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country.
    • Authors: Lee PY, Cheong AT, Ghazali SS, Rashid AA, Ong SC, Ong SY, Alip A, Sylvia M, Chen MF, Taib NA, Jaganathan M, Ng CJ, Teo SH
    • Issue date: 2022 Dec
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.