• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Cost effectiveness of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer: based on data from the Medical Research Council LU19 trial.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Bojke, Laura
    Sculpher, Mark
    Stephens, Richard J
    Qian, Wendi
    Thatcher, Nick
    Girling, David J
    Affiliation
    Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England. lg116@york.ac.uk
    Issue Date
    2006
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can enable dose intensification of chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, given its acquisition cost, it is important to assess its cost effectiveness within a resource-constrained health service. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness, from the UK NHS perspective, of G-CSF given in addition to doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) versus ACE alone in the management of SCLC. METHODS: Using data from a UK Medical Research Council trial (LU19) to assess chemotherapy dose intensification in patients with previously untreated SCLC of any disease extent, a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken. Resource use data, including hospitalisations and non-protocol cancer treatments, were collected during the first 6-month treatment phase of the trial. Mean costs ( pound, 2003 values) of managing patients in the two arms of the trial were calculated. Mean survival duration was calculated for the two groups using patient-specific follow-up data collected in the trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken, and uncertainty in cost effectiveness was expressed using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: The use of G-CSF in addition to ACE chemotherapy is more costly ( 4647 pounds) but results in longer mean survival duration (0.20 years; 0.18 years when discounted). This generates an incremental cost per additional life-year of 25,816 pounds for ACE + G-CSF therapy. The probability of the addition of G-CSF being cost effective, if decision makers are willing to pay 30,000 pounds for an additional life-year, is 0.57. Secondary analysis suggests that cost effectiveness is likely to be sensitive to assumptions about the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) experienced by patients. CONCLUSION: Based on data collected in the LU19 trial, chemotherapy dose intensification using G-CSF in SCLC adds to health service costs but increases survival duration. Its overall cost effectiveness is likely to be finely balanced.
    Citation
    Cost effectiveness of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer: based on data from the Medical Research Council LU19 trial. 2006, 24 (5):443-52 Pharmacoeconomics
    Journal
    Pharmacoeconomics
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/72515
    PubMed ID
    16706570
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1170-7690
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.
    • Authors: Thatcher N, Girling DJ, Hopwood P, Sambrook RJ, Qian W, Stephens RJ
    • Issue date: 2000 Jan
    • Docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early node-positive breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    • Authors: Wolowacz SE, Cameron DA, Tate HC, Bagust A
    • Issue date: 2008 Feb 20
    • Standard versus intensified chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in small-cell lung cancer: a prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Lung Cancer Group Phase III Trial-08923.
    • Authors: Ardizzoni A, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Postmus PE, Buchholz E, Biesma B, Karnicka-Mlodkowska H, Dziadziuszko R, Burghouts J, Van Meerbeeck JP, Gans S, Legrand C, Debruyne C, Giaccone G, Manegold C, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Lung Cancer Group.
    • Issue date: 2002 Oct 1
    • Increasing and planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) by adding recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.
    • Authors: Thatcher N, Clark PI, Smith DB, Anderson H, Girling DJ, Machin D, Stephens RJ, Lallemand G, Jenkins B
    • Issue date: 1995
    • The feasibility of using glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to increase the planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.
    • Authors: Thatcher N, Anderson H, Bleehen NM, Girling DJ, Lallemand G, Machin D, Stephens RJ
    • Issue date: 1995
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.