Authors
Jackson, AndrewReinsberg, S A
Sohaib, S A
Charles-Edwards, E M
Jhavar, S
Christmas, T J
Thompson, A C
Bailey, M J
Corbishley, C M
Fisher, C
Leach, Martin O
Dearnaley, David P
Affiliation
Academic Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK. Andrew.Jackson@manchester.ac.ukIssue Date
2009-02
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Radiotherapy dose escalation improves tumour control in prostate cancer but with increased toxicity. Boosting focal tumour only may allow dose escalation with acceptable toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy can deliver this, but visualization of the tumour remains limiting. CT or conventional MRI techniques are poor at localizing tumour, but dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) may be superior. 18 patients with prostate cancer had T(2) weighted (T2W) and DCE-MRI prior to prostatectomy. The prostate was sectioned meticulously so as to achieve accurate correlation between imaging and pathology. The accuracy of DCE-MRI for cancer detection was calculated by a pixel-by-pixel correlation of quantitative DCE-MRI parameter maps and pathology. In addition, a radiologist interpreted the DCE-MRI and T2W images. The location of tumour on imaging was compared with histology, and the accuracy of DCE-MRI and T2W images was then compared. Pixel-by-pixel comparison of quantitative parameter maps showed a significant difference between the benign peripheral zone and tumour for the parameters K(trans), v(e) and k(ep). Calculation of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the pharmacokinetic parameters were only "fair" discriminators between cancer and benign gland. Interpretation of DCE-MRI and T2W images by a radiologist showed DCE-MRI to be more sensitive than T2W images for tumour localization (50% vs 21%; p = 0.006) and similarly specific (85% vs 81%; p = 0.593). The superior sensitivity of DCE-MRI compared with T2W images, together with its high specificity, is arguably sufficient for its use in guiding radiotherapy boosts in prostate cancer.Citation
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization. 2009, 82 (974):148-56 Br J RadiolJournal
The British Journal of RadiologyDOI
10.1259/bjr/89518905PubMed ID
19168692Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1748-880Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1259/bjr/89518905
Scopus Count
Related articles
- Improving bladder cancer imaging using 3-T functional dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
- Authors: Nguyen HT, Pohar KS, Jia G, Shah ZK, Mortazavi A, Zynger DL, Wei L, Clark D, Yang X, Knopp MV
- Issue date: 2014 Jun
- Peripheral zone prostate cancer localization by multiparametric magnetic resonance at 3 T: unbiased cancer identification by matching to histopathology.
- Authors: Selnæs KM, Heerschap A, Jensen LR, Tessem MB, Schweder GJ, Goa PE, Viset T, Angelsen A, Gribbestad IS
- Issue date: 2012 Nov
- Semi-quantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters as prostate cancer imaging biomarkers for biologically targeted radiation therapy.
- Authors: Reynolds HM, Tadimalla S, Wang YF, Montazerolghaem M, Sun Y, Williams S, Mitchell C, Finnegan ME, Murphy DG, Haworth A
- Issue date: 2022 Dec 19
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters.
- Authors: Ocak I, Bernardo M, Metzger G, Barrett T, Pinto P, Albert PS, Choyke PL
- Issue date: 2007 Oct
- Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI.
- Authors: Harvey H, Orton MR, Morgan VA, Parker C, Dearnaley D, Fisher C, deSouza NM
- Issue date: 2017 Mar