IMRT dose fractionation for head and neck cancer: variation in current approaches will make standardisation difficult.
AffiliationAcademic Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractINTRODUCTION: Altered fractionation has demonstrated clinical benefits compared to the conventional 2 Gy/day standard of 70 Gy. When using synchronous chemotherapy, there is uncertainty about optimum fractionation. IMRT with its potential for Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) adds further to this uncertainty. This survey will examine international practice of IMRT fractionation and suggest possible reasons for diversity in approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen international cancer centres were surveyed for IMRT dose/fractionation practised in each centre. RESULTS: Twelve different types of dose fractionation were reported. Conventional 70-72 Gy (daily 2 Gy/fraction) was used in 3/14 centres with concurrent chemotherapy while 11/14 centres used altered fractionation. Two centres used >1 schedule. Reported schedules and number of centres included 6 fractions/week DAHANCA regime (3), modest hypofractionation (< or =2.2 Gy/fraction) (3), dose-escalated hypofractionation (> or =2.3 Gy/fraction) (4), hyperfractionation (1), continuous acceleration (1) and concomitant boost (1). Reasons for dose fractionation variability include (i) dose escalation; (ii) total irradiated volume; (iii) number of target volumes; (iv) synchronous systemic treatment; (v) shorter overall treatment time; (vi) resources availability; (vii) longer time on treatment couch; (viii) variable GTV margins; (ix) confidence in treatment setup; (x) late tissue toxicity and (xi) use of lower neck anterior fields. CONCLUSIONS: This variability in IMRT fractionation makes any meaningful comparison of treatment results difficult. Some standardization is needed particularly for design of multi-centre randomized clinical trials.
CitationIMRT dose fractionation for head and neck cancer: variation in current approaches will make standardisation difficult. 2009, 48 (3):431-9 Acta Oncol
- Comparative dosimetric evaluation of the simultaneous integrated boost with photon intensity modulation in head and neck cancer patients.
- Authors: Fogliata A, Bolsi A, Cozzi L, Bernier J
- Issue date: 2003 Dec
- Simultaneous integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for locally advanced gynecological cancer: radiobiological and dosimetric considerations.
- Authors: Guerrero M, Li XA, Ma L, Linder J, Deyoung C, Erickson B
- Issue date: 2005 Jul 1
- IMRT using simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) in head and neck cancer patients.
- Authors: Studer G, Huguenin PU, Davis JB, Kunz G, Lütolf UM, Glanzmann C
- Issue date: 2006 Mar 31
- Radiobiological considerations in the design of fractionation strategies for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancers.
- Authors: Mohan R, Wu Q, Manning M, Schmidt-Ullrich R
- Issue date: 2000 Feb 1
- Radiobiological basis and clinical results of the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer: A review.
- Authors: Orlandi E, Palazzi M, Pignoli E, Fallai C, Giostra A, Olmi P
- Issue date: 2010 Feb