Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenry, Ann M
dc.contributor.authorRyder, W David J
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Christopher J
dc.contributor.authorSherlock, David J
dc.contributor.authorGeh, J I
dc.contributor.authorDunn, P
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Patricia M
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-21T16:30:06Z
dc.date.available2009-05-21T16:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2008-09
dc.identifier.citationChemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a radiotherapy dose escalation and organ motion study. 2008, 20 (7):541-7 Clin Oncolen
dc.identifier.issn0936-6555
dc.identifier.pmid18562186
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clon.2008.03.004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/68699
dc.description.abstractAIMS: To determine the efficacy of radiation dose escalation and to examine organ motion during conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who were consecutively treated with chemoradiotherapy were studied. Fifteen patients, treated from 1993 to 1997, received 50 Gy in 20 fractions (group I). Twenty-four patients, treated from 1997 to 2003, received an escalated dose of 55 Gy in 25 fractions (group II). Intra-fraction pancreatic tumour motion was assessed in three patients using megavoltage movies during radiation delivery to track implanted radio-opaque markers. RESULTS: Improved survival rates were seen in latterly treated group II patients (P=0.083), who received escalated radiotherapy to smaller treatment volumes due to advances in verification. Worse toxicity effects (World Health Organization grade 3-4) were reported by some patients (<10%), but treatment compliance was similar in both groups, indicating equivalent tolerance. Substantial intra-fraction tumour displacement due to respiratory motion was observed: this was greatest in the superior/inferior (mean=6.6 mm) and anterior/posterior (mean=4.75 mm) directions. Lateral displacements were small (<2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation is feasible in pancreatic cancer, particularly when combined with a reduction in irradiated volume, and enhanced efficacy is indicated. Large, globally applied margins to compensate for pancreatic tumour motion during radiotherapy may be inappropriate. Strategies to reduce respiratory motion, and/or the application of image-guided techniques that incorporate individual patients' respiratory motion into radiotherapy planning and delivery, will probably improve pancreatic radiotherapy.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectDose Escalationen
dc.subjectImagingen
dc.subjectMotionen
dc.subjectPancreatic Canceren
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshAntineoplastic Agents
dc.subject.meshCombined Modality Therapy
dc.subject.meshDose-Response Relationship, Radiation
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshKaplan-Meiers Estimate
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshPancreatic Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshRadiation Injuries
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studies
dc.titleChemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a radiotherapy dose escalation and organ motion study.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentAcademic Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Manchester, Department of Medical Statistics, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalClinical Oncologyen
html.description.abstractAIMS: To determine the efficacy of radiation dose escalation and to examine organ motion during conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who were consecutively treated with chemoradiotherapy were studied. Fifteen patients, treated from 1993 to 1997, received 50 Gy in 20 fractions (group I). Twenty-four patients, treated from 1997 to 2003, received an escalated dose of 55 Gy in 25 fractions (group II). Intra-fraction pancreatic tumour motion was assessed in three patients using megavoltage movies during radiation delivery to track implanted radio-opaque markers. RESULTS: Improved survival rates were seen in latterly treated group II patients (P=0.083), who received escalated radiotherapy to smaller treatment volumes due to advances in verification. Worse toxicity effects (World Health Organization grade 3-4) were reported by some patients (<10%), but treatment compliance was similar in both groups, indicating equivalent tolerance. Substantial intra-fraction tumour displacement due to respiratory motion was observed: this was greatest in the superior/inferior (mean=6.6 mm) and anterior/posterior (mean=4.75 mm) directions. Lateral displacements were small (<2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation is feasible in pancreatic cancer, particularly when combined with a reduction in irradiated volume, and enhanced efficacy is indicated. Large, globally applied margins to compensate for pancreatic tumour motion during radiotherapy may be inappropriate. Strategies to reduce respiratory motion, and/or the application of image-guided techniques that incorporate individual patients' respiratory motion into radiotherapy planning and delivery, will probably improve pancreatic radiotherapy.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record