Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a radiotherapy dose escalation and organ motion study.
dc.contributor.author | Henry, Ann M | |
dc.contributor.author | Ryder, W David J | |
dc.contributor.author | Moore, Christopher J | |
dc.contributor.author | Sherlock, David J | |
dc.contributor.author | Geh, J I | |
dc.contributor.author | Dunn, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Price, Patricia M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-05-21T16:30:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-05-21T16:30:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a radiotherapy dose escalation and organ motion study. 2008, 20 (7):541-7 Clin Oncol | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0936-6555 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18562186 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.clon.2008.03.004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10541/68699 | |
dc.description.abstract | AIMS: To determine the efficacy of radiation dose escalation and to examine organ motion during conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who were consecutively treated with chemoradiotherapy were studied. Fifteen patients, treated from 1993 to 1997, received 50 Gy in 20 fractions (group I). Twenty-four patients, treated from 1997 to 2003, received an escalated dose of 55 Gy in 25 fractions (group II). Intra-fraction pancreatic tumour motion was assessed in three patients using megavoltage movies during radiation delivery to track implanted radio-opaque markers. RESULTS: Improved survival rates were seen in latterly treated group II patients (P=0.083), who received escalated radiotherapy to smaller treatment volumes due to advances in verification. Worse toxicity effects (World Health Organization grade 3-4) were reported by some patients (<10%), but treatment compliance was similar in both groups, indicating equivalent tolerance. Substantial intra-fraction tumour displacement due to respiratory motion was observed: this was greatest in the superior/inferior (mean=6.6 mm) and anterior/posterior (mean=4.75 mm) directions. Lateral displacements were small (<2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation is feasible in pancreatic cancer, particularly when combined with a reduction in irradiated volume, and enhanced efficacy is indicated. Large, globally applied margins to compensate for pancreatic tumour motion during radiotherapy may be inappropriate. Strategies to reduce respiratory motion, and/or the application of image-guided techniques that incorporate individual patients' respiratory motion into radiotherapy planning and delivery, will probably improve pancreatic radiotherapy. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Dose Escalation | en |
dc.subject | Imaging | en |
dc.subject | Motion | en |
dc.subject | Pancreatic Cancer | en |
dc.subject | Radiotherapy | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 and over | |
dc.subject.mesh | Antineoplastic Agents | |
dc.subject.mesh | Combined Modality Therapy | |
dc.subject.mesh | Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Kaplan-Meiers Estimate | |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Pancreatic Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Radiation Injuries | |
dc.subject.mesh | Retrospective Studies | |
dc.title | Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a radiotherapy dose escalation and organ motion study. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Manchester, Department of Medical Statistics, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK. | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Clinical Oncology | en |
html.description.abstract | AIMS: To determine the efficacy of radiation dose escalation and to examine organ motion during conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who were consecutively treated with chemoradiotherapy were studied. Fifteen patients, treated from 1993 to 1997, received 50 Gy in 20 fractions (group I). Twenty-four patients, treated from 1997 to 2003, received an escalated dose of 55 Gy in 25 fractions (group II). Intra-fraction pancreatic tumour motion was assessed in three patients using megavoltage movies during radiation delivery to track implanted radio-opaque markers. RESULTS: Improved survival rates were seen in latterly treated group II patients (P=0.083), who received escalated radiotherapy to smaller treatment volumes due to advances in verification. Worse toxicity effects (World Health Organization grade 3-4) were reported by some patients (<10%), but treatment compliance was similar in both groups, indicating equivalent tolerance. Substantial intra-fraction tumour displacement due to respiratory motion was observed: this was greatest in the superior/inferior (mean=6.6 mm) and anterior/posterior (mean=4.75 mm) directions. Lateral displacements were small (<2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation is feasible in pancreatic cancer, particularly when combined with a reduction in irradiated volume, and enhanced efficacy is indicated. Large, globally applied margins to compensate for pancreatic tumour motion during radiotherapy may be inappropriate. Strategies to reduce respiratory motion, and/or the application of image-guided techniques that incorporate individual patients' respiratory motion into radiotherapy planning and delivery, will probably improve pancreatic radiotherapy. |