AffiliationDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland. firstname.lastname@example.org
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractMeta-analysis, the statistical combination of results from several studies to produce a single estimate of a treatment effect or size of an association, continues to attract controversy. We illustrate and discuss the promises and limitations of meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of clinical trials can prevent delays in the introduction of effective treatments or lead to the timely identification of adverse effects. However, meta-analyses are liable to numerous biases, both at the level of the individual study and the selection of studies for inclusion in meta-analysis. The biases and confounding factors that threaten the validity of individual studies will also affect meta-analyses of observational studies. We argue that meta-analyses should only be performed within the framework of systematic reviews that have been prepared using methods that minimize bias and address the combinability of studies.
CitationMeta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations., 26 (3):320-9 Urol. Oncol.
- Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
- Authors: Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA
- Issue date: 2009 Sep-Oct
- More than the sum of its parts: meta-analysis and its potential to discover sources of heterogeneity in psychosomatic medicine.
- Authors: Tak LM, Meijer A, Manoharan A, de Jonge P, Rosmalen JG
- Issue date: 2010 Apr
- How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
- Authors: Tseng TY, Dahm P, Poolman RW, Preminger GM, Canales BJ, Montori VM
- Issue date: 2008 Oct
- How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
- Authors: Leucht S, Kissling W, Davis JM
- Issue date: 2009 Jun
- Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
- Authors: Shrier I, Boivin JF, Steele RJ, Platt RW, Furlan A, Kakuma R, Brophy J, Rossignol M
- Issue date: 2007 Nov 15