• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Plasma pharmacokinetic evaluation of cytotoxic agents radiolabelled with positron emitting radioisotopes.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Saleem, Azeem
    Aboagye, E O
    Matthews, Julian C
    Price, Patricia M
    Affiliation
    Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, and The University of Manchester Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. azeem.saleem@manchester.ac.uk
    Issue Date
    2008-04
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of plasma pharmacokinetic analyses of anti-cancer agents from data obtained during positron emission tomography (PET) oncology studies of radiolabelled anti-cancer agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients were administered fluorine-18 radiolabelled 5-FU ([(18)F]5-FU) admixed with 5-FU, corresponding to a total 5-FU dose of 380-407 mg/m2 (eight patients) and 1 mg/m2 (five patients). Nine patients received 2.2-19.2 microg/m2 of carbon-11 radiolabelled N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide ([11C]DACA) at 1/1,000th of phase I dose, as part of phase 0 microdosing study. Radioactivity of parent drug obtained from arterial blood samples, the injected activity of the radiolabelled drug, and the total dose of injected drug were used to obtain plasma drug concentrations. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using model-dependent and model-independent methods. RESULTS: 5-FU plasma concentrations at therapeutic doses were above the Km and a single compartment kinetic model was best used to fit the kinetics, with a mean half-life of 8.6 min. Clearance and volumes of distribution (Vd) obtained using both model-dependent and model-independent methods were similar. Mean (SE) clearance was 1,421(144), ml min(-1) and 1,319 (119) ml min(-1) and the mean (SE) Vd was 17.3 (1.8) l and 16.3 (1.9) l by the model-independent method and model-dependent methods, respectively. In contrast, with 1 mg/m2, plasma concentrations of 5-FU were less than the Km and a two-compartment model was used to best fit the kinetics, with the mean 5-FU half-life of 6.5 min. The mean (SE) clearances obtained by the model-independent method and model-dependent methods were 3,089 (314) ml min(-1) and 2,225 (200) ml min(-1), respectively and the mean (SE) Vd were 27.9 (7.0) l and 2.3 (0.4) l, by the model independent and dependent methods, respectively. Extrapolation of AUC0-Clast to AUC0-infinity was less than 3% in both these cohort of patients. A two-compartment model with a mean half-life of 42.1 min was used to best fit the kinetics of DACA; considerable extrapolation (mean 26%) was required to obtain AUC0-infinity from AUC0-Clast. Mean (SE) clearance of DACA was 1,920 (269) ml min(-1), with the model-independent method and 1,627 (287) ml min(-1) with the model-dependent method. Similarly, Vd [mean (SE)] of DACA with the model-independent and model-dependent methods were 118 (22) l and 50 (15) l, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic parameters can be estimated with confidence from PET studies for agents given at therapeutic doses, whose half-lives are significantly less than the total sampling time during the scan. Tracer studies performed alone, wherein plasma levels below the Km are expected, may also provide valuable information on drug clearance for the entire range of linear kinetics. However, drugs with half-lives longer than the sampling duration are inappropriate for PET plasma pharmacokinetic evaluation.
    Citation
    Plasma pharmacokinetic evaluation of cytotoxic agents radiolabelled with positron emitting radioisotopes. 2008, 61 (5):865-73 Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.
    Journal
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/67979
    DOI
    10.1007/s00280-007-0552-2
    PubMed ID
    17639391
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0344-5704
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1007/s00280-007-0552-2
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications
    Academic Department of Radiation Oncology - ADRO

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Pharmacokinetic evaluation of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide in patients by positron emission tomography.
    • Authors: Saleem A, Harte RJ, Matthews JC, Osman S, Brady F, Luthra SK, Brown GD, Bleehen N, Connors T, Jones T, Price PM, Aboagye EO
    • Issue date: 2001 Mar 1
    • Plasma pharmacokinetics of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide in a phase I trial.
    • Authors: Kestell P, Dunlop IC, McCrystal MR, Evans BD, Paxton JW, Gamage RS, Baguley BC
    • Issue date: 1999
    • Comparative biodistribution and metabolism of carbon-11-labeled N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide and DNA-intercalating analogues.
    • Authors: Osman S, Rowlinson-Busza G, Luthra SK, Aboagye EO, Brown GD, Brady F, Myers R, Gamage SA, Denny WA, Baguley BC, Price PM
    • Issue date: 2001 Apr 1
    • Studies on the metabolism of the novel antitumor agent [N-methyl-11C]N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide in rats and humans prior to phase I clinical trials.
    • Authors: Osman S, Luthra SK, Brady F, Hume SP, Brown G, Harte RJ, Matthews JC, Denny WA, Baguley BC, Jones T, Price PM
    • Issue date: 1997 Jun 1
    • Pharmacokinetic assessment of novel anti-cancer drugs using spectral analysis and positron emission tomography: a feasibility study.
    • Authors: Meikle SR, Matthews JC, Brock CS, Wells P, Harte RJ, Cunningham VJ, Jones T, Price P
    • Issue date: 1998
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.