Radical chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction: what planning margins should we use?
AffiliationAcademic Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. email@example.com
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractDistal oesophageal and Type I-II oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas have a poor prognosis. In radical chemoradiotherapy, consensus is lacking on radiotherapy margins. Here, we review the effect of common imaging modalities on the extent of the gross tumour volume (GTV) and the evidence for margins. To do this, papers were identified from PubMed, and geometric uncertainties were combined using the British Institute of Radiology formula. CT and endoscopic ultrasound were best for GTV delineation, but the role of positron emission tomography is uncertain. Evidence suggests 3 cm proximal and 5 cm distal GTV-CTV (clinical target volume) margins (along the mucosa) for advanced tumours, but is lacking for early tumours and radial margins. Nodal spread, present in most pT2 tumours, is strongly prognostic and is initially to regional nodes (not wholly covered by typical radiotherapy). Calculated CTV-PTV (planning target volume) margins for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using literature estimates of tumour motion and set-up errors with bony online set-up correction, ignoring delineation errors, are 2.2 cm superiorly (sup) and inferiorly (inf) and 1.2-1.3 cm radially (1.3 cm sup-inf; 0.8 cm radially if the tumour's mid-position is known). As these margins may risk excessive toxicity, we propose treating microscopic disease for potentially curable tumours (cT2N0, some cT3N0), but gross disease only for advanced tumours. Recommended GTV-CTV margins are a maximum of 3 cm proximally and 5 cm distally up to cT2N0; 3 cm proximally and 5 cm distally for cT3N0 if anticipated toxicity allows; and 0 cm for cT4 and most node-positive tumours. The CTV-PTV margins above must be added to this for all stages. Methods of including elective nodal areas close to the GTV should be researched, e.g. nodal maps and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
CitationRadical chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction: what planning margins should we use? 2008, 81 (972):921-34 Br J Radiol
JournalThe British Journal of Radiology
- A prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer.
- Authors: Leong T, Everitt C, Yuen K, Condron S, Hui A, Ngan SY, Pitman A, Lau EW, MacManus M, Binns D, Ackerly T, Hicks RJ
- Issue date: 2006 Mar
- IMRT for prostate cancer: defining target volume based on correlated pathologic volume of disease.
- Authors: Teh BS, Bastasch MD, Wheeler TM, Mai WY, Frolov A, Uhl BM, Lu HH, Carpenter LS, Chiu JK, McGary J, Woo SY, Grant WH 3rd, Butler EB
- Issue date: 2003 May 1
- The value of magnetic resonance imaging in target volume delineation of base of tongue tumours--a study using flexible surface coils.
- Authors: Ahmed M, Schmidt M, Sohaib A, Kong C, Burke K, Richardson C, Usher M, Brennan S, Riddell A, Davies M, Newbold K, Harrington KJ, Nutting CM
- Issue date: 2010 Feb
- DeepTarget: Gross tumor and clinical target volume segmentation in esophageal cancer radiotherapy.
- Authors: Jin D, Guo D, Ho TY, Harrison AP, Xiao J, Tseng CK, Lu L
- Issue date: 2021 Feb
- Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination as a rationale for elective lymphatic target volume definition.
- Authors: Meier I, Merkel S, Papadopoulos T, Sauer R, Hohenberger W, Brunner TB
- Issue date: 2008 Apr 1