• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Development, validation, and clinical utility of electronic patient-reported outcome measure-enhanced prediction models for overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Liao, K.
    van der Veer, S. N.
    Gomes, Fabio
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    Yorke, Janelle
    Sperrin, M.
    Affiliation
    Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. Division of Cancer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. Patient-Centred Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
    Issue Date
    2024
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    PURPOSE: Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) are increasingly collected routinely in clinical practice and may be prognostic for survival in adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in addition to clinical data. This study developed ePROM-enhanced models for predicting 1-year overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC at the start of immunotherapy. METHODS: This is a single-center study using consecutive patients from a tertiary cancer hospital in England. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we developed one clinical factor-only model and three ePROM-enhanced models, each including one of the following factors: quality of life (as measured by EuroQoL five-dimension five-level utility score) and overall symptom burden and number of moderate-to-severe symptoms (as measured by patient-reported version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Predictive performance was evaluated and compared through bootstrapping internal validation, and clinical utility was determined via decision curve analysis. RESULTS: The clinical factor-only model contained age, histology, performance status, and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio. While calibration was similar between the clinical factor-only and ePROM-enhanced models, the latter showed improved discrimination by 0.020 (95% CI, 0.011 to 0.024), 0.024 (95% CI, 0.016 to 0.031), and 0.024 (95% CI, 0.014 to 0.029) when enhanced with ePROMs on quality of life, overall symptom burden, and number of moderate-to-severe symptoms, respectively. If care decisions are to be made at risk thresholds between 25% and 75%, the ePROM-enhanced models led to higher net benefit than the clinical factor-only model and the default strategies of intervention for all and intervention for none. CONCLUSION: The ePROM-enhanced models outperformed the clinical factor-only model in predicting 1-year overall survival for patients with advanced NSCLC receiving immunotherapy and showed potential clinical utility for informing decisions in this population. Future studies should focus on validating the models in external data sets.
    Citation
    Liao K, van der Veer SN, Gomes F, Faivre-Finn C, Yorke J, Sperrin M. Development, Validation, and Clinical Utility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Enhanced Prediction Models for Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy. JCO clinical cancer informatics. 2024 Dec;8:e2400035. PubMed PMID: 39591544. Epub 2024/11/26. eng.
    Journal
    JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/627340
    DOI
    10.1200/cci.24.00035
    PubMed ID
    39591544
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1200/cci.24.00035
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1200/cci.24.00035
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.