• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Examining the effectiveness of electronic patient-reported outcomes in people with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    jmir-2024-1-e49089.pdf
    Size:
    470.3Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Found with Open Access Button
    Download
    Authors
    Perry, Melissa B
    Taylor, Sally
    Khatoon, Binish
    Vercell, Amy
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    Velikova, G.
    Marsden, A.
    Heal, C.
    Yorke, Janelle
    Affiliation
    Christie Patient Centred Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Clinical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
    Issue Date
    2024
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are commonly used in oncology clinical practice and have shownbenefits for patients and health resource use.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the isolated effect of administering ePROs to patients with cancer versus acontrol condition.Methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed.Randomized controlled trials evaluating ePRO interventions that aimed to improve health-related outcomes among patients withcancer were included. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and the secondary outcomes weresymptoms, hospital admissions, unplanned visits, chemotherapy completion, survival, and satisfaction with care. The effect sizesof ePROs on health-related outcomes were analyzed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs using a randomeffects model.Results: The search identified 10,965 papers, of which 19 (0.17%) from 15 studies were included. The meta-analysis showedan improvement in HRQOL at 3 months, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (SMD 0.28, 95%CI -1.22 to 1.78), and at 6 months, assessed using various HRQOL measures (SMD 0.07, 95% CI -1.24 to 1.39). The resultsshould be interpreted with caution, given the wide 95% CIs. Of the 15 studies, 9 (60%) reported a positive signal on HRQOL,with two-thirds of the studies (n=6, 67%) including tailored patient advice and two-thirds (n=6, 67%) using clinician alert systems.Conclusions: The meta-analysis showed a potential improvement in HRQOL at 6 months and in Functional Assessment ofCancer Therapy-General scores at 3 months for studies that included tailored advice and clinician alerts, suggesting that theseelements may improve ePRO effectiveness. The findings will provide guidance for future use and help health care professionalschoose the most suitable ePRO features for their patients
    Citation
    Perry MB, Taylor S, Khatoon B, Vercell A, Faivre-Finn C, Velikova G, et al. Examining the Effectiveness of Electronic Patient-ReportedOutcomes in People With Cancer: Systematic Review andMeta-Analysis. Journal of medical Internet research. 2024 JUL 31;26. PubMed PMID: WOS:001302570600005. English.
    Journal
    Journal of Medical Internet Research
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/627162
    PubMed ID
    39083791
    Language
    en
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    • Authors: Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P
    • Issue date: 2022 Feb 1
    • Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures and quality of life in cancer (E-PROMISE): systematic review of the evidence and meta-analysis.
    • Authors: Husain N, Ansari Z, Shamim MA, Zahiri Z, Singh M, Kabir R, Samajdar SS, Dhodi D, Padhi BK, Kazmi AZ, Queiroz S, Nashwan AJ, Dwivedi P
    • Issue date: 2025 Apr 28
    • Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for people with cancer during active treatment.
    • Authors: Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Snyder C, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O
    • Issue date: 2012 Aug 15
    • The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    • Authors: Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W
    • Issue date: 2020 Nov
    • The effectiveness of symptom management interventions based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom burden, quality of life, and overall survival among patients with cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    • Authors: Li Y, Li J, Hu X
    • Issue date: 2023 Nov
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.