• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Reporting quality of published reviews of commercial and publicly available mobile health apps (mHealth app reviews): a scoping review protocol

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    e083364.full.pdf
    Size:
    453.5Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Found with Open Access Button
    Download
    Authors
    Gasteiger, N.
    Norman, G.
    Grainger, R.
    Eost-Telling, C.
    Jones, D.
    Ali, S. M.
    van der Veer, S. N.
    Ford, C. R.
    Hall, A.
    Law, Kate
    Byerly, M.
    Davies, A.
    Paripoorani, D.
    Shi, C. H.
    Dowding, D.
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    The Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
    Issue Date
    2024
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction Reviews of commercial and publicly available smartphone (mobile) health applications (mHealth app reviews) are being undertaken and published. However, there is variation in the conduct and reporting of mHealth app reviews, with no existing reporting guidelines. Building on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we aim to develop the Consensus for APP Review Reporting Items (CAPPRRI) guidance, to support the conduct and reporting of mHealth app reviews. This scoping review of published mHealth app reviews will explore their alignment, deviation, and modification to the PRISMA 2020 items for systematic reviews and identify a list of possible items to include in CAPPRRI. Method and analysis We are following the Joanna Briggs Institute approach and Arksey and O'Malley's five-step process. Patient and public contributors, mHealth app review, digital health research and evidence synthesis experts, healthcare professionals and a specialist librarian gave feedback on the methods. We will search SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, AMED, EMBASE, Medline, APA PsycINFO and the ACM Digital Library for articles reporting mHealth app reviews and use a two-step screening process to identify eligible articles. Information on whether the authors have reported, or how they have modified the PRISMA 2020 items in their reporting, will be extracted. Data extraction will also include the article characteristics, protocol and registration information, review question frameworks used, information about the search and screening process, how apps have been evaluated and evidence of stakeholder engagement. This will be analysed using a content synthesis approach and presented using descriptive statistics and summaries. This protocol is registered on OSF (https://osf.io/5ahjx). Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications (shared on our project website and on the EQUATOR Network website where the CAPPRRI guidance has been registered as under development), conference presentations and blog and social media posts in lay language.
    Citation
    Gasteiger N, Norman G, Grainger R, Eost-Telling C, Jones D, Ali SM, et al. Reporting quality of published reviews of commercial and publicly available mobile health apps (mHealth app reviews): a scoping review protocol. BMJ open. 2024 JUL;14(7). PubMed PMID: WOS:001265212100033. English.
    Journal
    BMJ Open
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/627142
    PubMed ID
    38964792
    Language
    en
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • A scoping review of the reporting quality of reviews of commercially and publicly available mobile health apps.
    • Authors: Gasteiger N, Norman G, Grainger R, van der Veer SN, McGarrigle L, Jones D, Eost-Telling C, Vercell A, Ford CR, Ali SM, Law K, Zhao Q, Byerly M, Shi C, Davies A, Hall A, Dowding D
    • Issue date: 2025 Feb
    • Digital Rights and Mobile Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
    • Authors: Poulsen A, Song YJC, Fosch-Villaronga E, LaMonica HM, Iannelli O, Alam M, Hickie IB
    • Issue date: 2023 Oct 3
    • Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide.
    • Authors: Gasteiger N, Dowding D, Norman G, McGarrigle L, Eost-Telling C, Jones D, Vercell A, Ali SM, O'Connor S
    • Issue date: 2023 Jun 12
    • Availability and use of mHealth for disease diagnosis and treatment support by health workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.
    • Authors: Osei E, Kuupiel D, Mashamba-Thompson TP
    • Issue date: 2020 Oct 20
    • Co-design of Digital Health Interventions for Young Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
    • Authors: Malloy JA, Partridge SR, Kemper JA, Braakhuis A, Roy R
    • Issue date: 2022 Oct 24
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.