• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    How long does contouring really take? results of the royal college of radiologists contouring surveys

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Montague, E.
    Roques, T.
    Spencer, K.
    Burnett, A.
    Lourenco, J.
    Thorp, Nicky
    Affiliation
    The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK
    Issue Date
    2024
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Aims: The success and safety of modern radiotherapy relies on accurate contouring. Understanding the time taken to complete radiotherapy contours is critical to informing workforce planning and, in the context of a workforce shortfall, advocating for investment in technology and multi-professional skills mix. aimed to quantify the time taken to delineate target volumes for radical radiotherapy.<br /> Materials and methods: The Royal College of Radiologists circulated two electronic surveys via email to all clinical oncology consultants in the UK. The individual case survey requested anonymous data regarding the next five patients contoured for radical radiotherapy. The second survey collected data on respondents usual practice in radiotherapy contouring.<br /> Results: The median time to contour one radiotherapy case was 85 minutes (IQR 1 / 4 50-131 minutes). Marked variability between and within tumour sites evident: paediatric cancers took the most time (median 1 / 4 210 minutes, IQR 1 / 4 87.5 minutes), followed by head and neck and gynaecological cancers (median 120 minutes, IQR 1 / 4 71 and 72.5 minutes respectively). Breast cancer contouring required the least time (median 1 / 4 43 minutes, IQR 1 / 4 60 minutes). Radiotherapy technique, inclusion of nodes and 4D CT planning were associated with longer contouring times. A non-medical professional was involved in contouring in of cases, but clinical oncology consultants were involved in target volume delineation in 90% of cases, and OARs in 74%. Peer review took place in 46% of cases with 56% of consultants reporting no time for peer review in their job plan.<br /> Conclusion: Contouring for radical radiotherapy is complex and time-consuming, and despite increasing involvement of non-medical professionals, clinical oncology consultants remain the primary practitioners. Peer review practice is variable and time is often a limiting factor. Many factors in fluence the required for contouring, and departments should take these factors and the need for peer-review into account when developing job plans. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
    Citation
    Montague E, Roques T, Spencer K, Burnett A, Lourenco J, Thorp N. How Long Does Contouring Really Take? Results of the Royal College of Radiologists Contouring Surveys. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. 2024 JUN;36(6):335-42.
    Journal
    Clinical Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/627101
    DOI
    10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.005
    PubMed ID
    38519383
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.005
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.005
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Contouring experiences amongst Australian, New Zealand and Singaporean radiation oncology trainees. Is it enough? What next?
    • Authors: Leung J, Lehman M
    • Issue date: 2019 Jun
    • Artificial Intelligence for Radiotherapy Auto-Contouring: Current Use, Perceptions of and Barriers to Implementation.
    • Authors: Hindocha S, Zucker K, Jena R, Banfill K, Mackay K, Price G, Pudney D, Wang J, Taylor A
    • Issue date: 2023 Apr
    • Peer Review of Radiotherapy Planning: Quantifying Outcomes and a Proposal for Prospective Data Collection.
    • Authors: Mackenzie J, Graham G, Olivotto IA
    • Issue date: 2016 Dec
    • vOARiability: Interobserver and intermodality variability analysis in OAR contouring from head and neck CT and MR images.
    • Authors: Podobnik G, Ibragimov B, Peterlin P, Strojan P, Vrtovec T
    • Issue date: 2024 Mar
    • Initial Evaluation of a Novel Cone-Beam CT-Based Semi-Automated Online Adaptive Radiotherapy System for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment - A Timing and Automation Quality Study.
    • Authors: Yoon SW, Lin H, Alonso-Basanta M, Anderson N, Apinorasethkul O, Cooper K, Dong L, Kempsey B, Marcel J, Metz J, Scheuermann R, Li T
    • Issue date: 2020 Aug 11
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.