Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFelip, E.en
dc.contributor.authorCho, B. C.en
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, V.en
dc.contributor.authorAlip, A.en
dc.contributor.authorBesse, B.en
dc.contributor.authorLu, S.en
dc.contributor.authorSpira, A. I.en
dc.contributor.authorGirard, N.en
dc.contributor.authorCalifano, Raffaeleen
dc.contributor.authorGadgeel, S. M.en
dc.contributor.authorYang, J. C.en
dc.contributor.authorYamamoto, S.en
dc.contributor.authorAzuma, K.en
dc.contributor.authorKim, Y. J.en
dc.contributor.authorLee, K. H.en
dc.contributor.authorDanchaivijitr, P.en
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, C. G.en
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Y.en
dc.contributor.authorSendur, M. A. N.en
dc.contributor.authorChang, G. C.en
dc.contributor.authorWang, C. C.en
dc.contributor.authorPrabhash, K.en
dc.contributor.authorShinno, Y.en
dc.contributor.authorStroyakovskiy, D.en
dc.contributor.authorPaz-Ares, L.en
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Cid, J. R.en
dc.contributor.authorMartin, C.en
dc.contributor.authorCampelo, M. R. G.en
dc.contributor.authorHayashi, H.en
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, D.en
dc.contributor.authorTomasini, P.en
dc.contributor.authorGottfried, M.en
dc.contributor.authorDooms, C.en
dc.contributor.authorPassaro, A.en
dc.contributor.authorSchuler, M.en
dc.contributor.authorGelatti, A. C. Z.en
dc.contributor.authorOwen, S.en
dc.contributor.authorPerdrizet, K.en
dc.contributor.authorOu, S. I.en
dc.contributor.authorCurtin, J. C.en
dc.contributor.authorZhang, J.en
dc.contributor.authorGormley, M.en
dc.contributor.authorSun, T.en
dc.contributor.authorPanchal, A.en
dc.contributor.authorEnnis, M.en
dc.contributor.authorFennema, E.en
dc.contributor.authorDaksh, M.en
dc.contributor.authorSethi, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBauml, J. M.en
dc.contributor.authorLee, S. H.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T09:57:03Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T09:57:03Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.identifier.citationFelip E, Cho BC, Gutiérrez V, Alip A, Besse B, Lu S, et al. Amivantamab plus lazertinib versus osimertinib in first-line EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with biomarkers of high-risk disease: a secondary analysis from MARIPOSA. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2024 Jun 26.en
dc.identifier.pmid38942080en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annonc.2024.05.541en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/627081
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) 0.70; P < 0.001], including those with a history of brain metastases (HR 0.69). Patients with TP53 co-mutations, detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), baseline liver metastases, and those without ctDNA clearance on treatment have poor prognoses. We evaluated outcomes in these high-risk subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This analysis included patients with treatment-naive, EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC randomized to amivantamab-lazertinib (n = 429) or osimertinib (n = 429) in MARIPOSA. Pathogenic alterations were identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of baseline blood ctDNA with Guardant360 CDx. Ex19del and L858R ctDNA in blood was analyzed at baseline and cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1) with Biodesix droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). RESULTS: Baseline ctDNA for NGS of pathogenic alterations was available for 636 patients (amivantamab-lazertinib, n = 320; osimertinib, n = 316). Amivantamab-lazertinib improved median PFS (mPFS) versus osimertinib for patients with TP53 co-mutations {18.2 versus 12.9 months; HR 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.87]; P = 0.003} and for patients with wild-type TP53 [22.1 versus 19.9 months; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.52-1.07)]. In patients with EGFR-mutant, ddPCR-detectable baseline ctDNA, amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged mPFS versus osimertinib [20.3 versus 14.8 months; HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53-0.86); P = 0.002]. Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly improved mPFS versus osimertinib in patients without ctDNA clearance at C3D1 [16.5 versus 9.1 months; HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.27-0.87); P = 0.015] and with clearance [24.0 versus 16.5 months; HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.87); P = 0.004]. Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged mPFS versus osimertinib among randomized patients with [18.2 versus 11.0 months; HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.37-0.91); P = 0.017] and without baseline liver metastases [24.0 versus 18.3 months; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.60-0.91); P = 0.004]. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab-lazertinib effectively overcomes the effect of high-risk features and represents a promising new standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleAmivantamab plus lazertinib versus osimertinib in first-line EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with biomarkers of high-risk disease: a secondary analysis from MARIPOSAen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalAnnals of Oncologyen
dc.description.noteen]
refterms.dateFOA2024-07-31T15:39:49Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Amivantamab plus....pdf
Size:
612.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Found with Open Access Button

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record