Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMansoor, Wasaten
dc.contributor.authorJoo, S.en
dc.contributor.authorNorquist, J. M.en
dc.contributor.authorKato, K.en
dc.contributor.authorSun, J. M.en
dc.contributor.authorShah, M. A.en
dc.contributor.authorEnzinger, P.en
dc.contributor.authorAdenis, A.en
dc.contributor.authorDoi, T.en
dc.contributor.authorKojima, T.en
dc.contributor.authorMetges, J. P.en
dc.contributor.authorLi, Z.en
dc.contributor.authorKim, S. B.en
dc.contributor.authorCho, B. C.en
dc.contributor.authorSunpaweravong, P.en
dc.contributor.authorAlsina Maqueda, M.en
dc.contributor.authorGoekkurt, E.en
dc.contributor.authorSuryawanshi, S.en
dc.contributor.authorShah, S.en
dc.contributor.authorShen, L.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-08T15:12:56Z
dc.date.available2024-07-08T15:12:56Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.identifier.citationMansoor W, Joo S, Norquist JM, Kato K, Sun JM, Shah MA, et al. Health-related quality-of-life analysis from KEYNOTE-590: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Oncologist. 2024 May 30. PubMed PMID: 38815152. Epub 2024/05/30. eng.en
dc.identifier.pmid38815152en
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/oncolo/oyae087en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/627043
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In the KEYNOTE-590 study, first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provided statistically significant improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate compared with chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes are reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Change from baseline to week 18 in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status/QoL (GHS/QoL) and QLQ-Esophageal cancer module (OES18) dysphagia, pain, and reflux scales were evaluated. RESULTS: The HRQoL analysis included 730 patients who received treatment and completed ≥1 HRQoL assessment. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 18 was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 reflux scales. The QLQ-OES18 dysphagia (LSM difference, -5.54; 95% CI, -10.93 to -0.16) and pain (LSM difference, -2.94; 95% CI, -5.86 to -0.02) scales favored pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy over placebo plus chemotherapy. Median time to confirmed deterioration (TTD) was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 dysphagia and reflux scales. Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged median TTD, as seen on the QLQ-OES18 pain scale (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: The use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy maintained HRQoL at week 18 relative to baseline and was comparable with placebo plus chemotherapy. These HRQoL results together with published reports of efficacy, support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT03189719.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae087en
dc.titleHealth-related quality-of-life analysis from KEYNOTE-590: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal canceren
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.en
dc.identifier.journalThe Oncologisten
dc.description.noteen]
refterms.dateFOA2024-07-10T15:19:00Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
oyae087.pdf
Size:
610.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Found with Open Access Button

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record