• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Patient-reported outcomes and experiences from a prospective cohort study of older patients with cancer on checkpoint inhibitors: the ELDERS study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Gomes, Fabio
    Khatoon, Binish
    Sawyer, Chelsea
    Punnett, Grant
    Farrington, Naomi
    Yorke, Janelle
    Affiliation
    Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Christie Patient Centred Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Senior Adult Oncology Service, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
    Issue Date
    2024
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    INTRODUCTION: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are widely used across different tumour types in older cancer patients. The ELDERS study investigated primarily the safety of CPI in older patients, and secondarily its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), comparing older and younger patients. Here we describe the results from its secondary aim. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational, mixed methods study, consisting of questionnaires and qualitative interviews. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and at three-monthly reviews (up to four over the planned 12 months on study). RESULTS: One hundred and forty patients, 70 in each age cohort (older: ≥70 years of age, younger: <70 years of age), were recruited. Twenty-four patients, 12 in each age cohort, were interviewed. The mean baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 score was 65/100 for both cohorts combined, and the score for the full QLQ-C30 assessment was 78/100 and 75/100 for older and younger, respectively. The physical functioning score was the only subscale to change significantly between baseline and the first and second reviews (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively), resulting from some improvement in the mean score (from baseline) within the younger cohort and some decline within the older cohort. However, when focusing on each cohort separately, the change over time was not statistically significant for either. Two main themes from the interviews were 'expectations' (thoughts about treatment before commencing) and 'experience' (lived experience during treatment). DISCUSSION: Quantitatively, there was no difference in the effect of CPIs on HRQoL between the cohorts, although qualitative data from interviews suggested that there were some experiential differences. People in the older cohort were less likely to seek additional information about CPIs and were more likely to report side effects. In terms of both 'expectations' and 'experience,' the older cohort was a heterogenous group, highlighting that an individualised approach is needed when supporting this group. This study shows that older patients can be reassured that immunotherapy is unlikely to negatively impact their HRQoL more than younger patients, and it should be considered a viable treatment option.
    Citation
    Gomes F, Khatoon B, Sawyer C, Punnett G, Farrington N, Yorke J. Patient-reported outcomes and experiences from a prospective cohort study of older patients with cancer on checkpoint inhibitors: The ELDERS study. Journal of geriatric oncology. 2024 Jun;15(5):101777. PubMed PMID: 38704912. Epub 2024/05/06. eng.
    Journal
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/627021
    DOI
    10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101777
    PubMed ID
    38704912
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101777
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101777
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Association between Geriatric 8 frailty and health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer (PROGNOSIS-G8): a Danish single-centre, prospective cohort study.
    • Authors: Ditzel HM, Giger AW, Lund CM, Ditzel HJ, Möller S, Pfeiffer P, Ryg J, Ewertz M, Jørgensen TL
    • Issue date: 2024 Sep
    • Does palliative chemotherapy really palliate and are we measuring it correctly? A mixed methods longitudinal study of health related quality of life in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
    • Authors: Gough N, Koffman J, Ross JR, Riley J, Judson I
    • Issue date: 2019
    • Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (CAPItello-291): patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    • Authors: Oliveira M, Rugo HS, Howell SJ, Dalenc F, Cortes J, Gomez HL, Hu X, Toi M, Jhaveri K, Krivorotko P, Loibl S, Morales Murillo S, Okera M, Nowecki Z, Park YH, Sohn JH, Tokunaga E, Yousef S, Zhukova L, Fulford M, Andrews H, Wadsworth I, D'Cruz C, Turner NC, CAPItello-291 study group
    • Issue date: 2024 Sep
    • The EORTC QLU-C10D distinguished better between cancer patients and the general population than PROPr and EQ-5D-5L in a cross-sectional study.
    • Authors: Döhmen A, Obbarius A, Kock M, Nolte S, Sidey-Gibbons CJ, Valderas JM, Rohde J, Rieger K, Fischer F, Keilholz U, Rose M, Klapproth CP
    • Issue date: 2025 Jan
    • Health-related quality of life with belzutifan versus everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma (LITESPARK-005): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
    • Authors: Powles T, Choueiri TK, Albiges L, Peltola K, de Velasco G, Burotto M, Suarez C, Ghatalia P, Iacovelli R, Lam ET, Verzoni E, Gümüş M, Stadler WM, Kollmannsberger C, Melichar B, Venugopal B, Gross-Goupil M, Poprach A, De Santis M, Rizzo M, Shinde R, Saretsky TL, He L, Perini RF, Vickery D, Rini B
    • Issue date: 2025 Apr
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.