Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVreeburg, M. T. A.en
dc.contributor.authorDonswijk, M. L.en
dc.contributor.authorAlbersen, M.en
dc.contributor.authorParnham, Arieen
dc.contributor.authorAyres, B.en
dc.contributor.authorProtzel, C.en
dc.contributor.authorPettaway, C.en
dc.contributor.authorSpiess, P. E.en
dc.contributor.authorBrouwer, O. R.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-21T13:03:33Z
dc.date.available2024-02-21T13:03:33Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.identifier.citationVreeburg MTA, Donswijk ML, Albersen M, Parnham A, Ayres B, Protzel C, et al. New EAU/ASCO guideline recommendations on sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer and remaining challenges from a nuclear medicine perspective. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Jan 13. PubMed PMID: 38216778.en
dc.identifier.pmid38216778en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00259-023-06586-6en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/626895
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recently issued updated guidelines on penile cancer, emphasising dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) as the preferred method for surgical staging among patients with invasive penile tumours and no palpable inguinal lymphadenopathy. This paper outlines the rationale behind this new recommendation and describes remaining challenges, as well as strategies for promoting DSNB worldwide. MAIN TEXT: DSNB offers high diagnostic accuracy with the lowest postoperative complications compared to open or minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND), prompting its preference in the new guidelines. Nevertheless, despite its advantages, there are challenges hampering the widespread adoption of DSNB. This includes the false-negative rate associated with DSNB and the potential negative impact on patient outcome. To address this issue, improvements should be made in several areas, including refining the timing and interpretation of the lymphoscintigraphy and the single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images. In addition, the quantity of tracer employed and choice of the injection site for the radiopharmaceutical should be optimised. Finally, limiting the removal of nodes without tracer activity during surgery may help minimise complication rates. CONCLUSION: Over the years, DSNB has evolved significantly, related to the dedicated efforts and innovations in nuclear medicine and subsequent clinical studies validating its efficacy. It is now strongly recommended for surgical staging among selected penile cancer patients. To optimise DSNB further, multidisciplinary collaborative research is required to improve SN identification for better diagnostic accuracy and fewer complications.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06586-6en
dc.titleNew EAU/ASCO guideline recommendations on sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer and remaining challenges from a nuclear medicine perspectiveen
dc.typeGuidelineen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.en
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imagingen
dc.description.noteen]


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record