• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    ARCHERY: a prospective observational study of artificial intelligence-based radiotherapy treatment planning for cervical, head and neck and prostate cancer - study protocol

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Archery....pdf
    Size:
    654.7Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Found with Open Access Button
    Download
    Authors
    Aggarwal, A.
    Court, L. E.
    Hoskin, Peter
    Jacques, I.
    Kroiss, M.
    Laskar, S.
    Lievens, Y.
    Mallick, I.
    Abdul Malik, R.
    Miles, E.
    Mohamad, I.
    Murphy, C.
    Nankivell, M.
    Parkes, J.
    Parmar, M.
    Roach, C.
    Simonds, H.
    Torode, J.
    Vanderstraeten, B.
    Langley, R.
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Department of Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
    Issue Date
    2023
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    INTRODUCTION: Fifty per cent of patients with cancer require radiotherapy during their disease course, however, only 10%-40% of patients in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) have access to it. A shortfall in specialised workforce has been identified as the most significant barrier to expanding radiotherapy capacity. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based software has been developed to automate both the delineation of anatomical target structures and the definition of the position, size and shape of the radiation beams. Proposed advantages include improved treatment accuracy, as well as a reduction in the time (from weeks to minutes) and human resources needed to deliver radiotherapy. METHODS: ARCHERY is a non-randomised prospective study to evaluate the quality and economic impact of AI-based automated radiotherapy treatment planning for cervical, head and neck, and prostate cancers, which are endemic in LMICs, and for which radiotherapy is the primary curative treatment modality. The sample size of 990 patients (330 for each cancer type) has been calculated based on an estimated 95% treatment plan acceptability rate. Time and cost savings will be analysed as secondary outcome measures using the time-driven activity-based costing model. The 48-month study will take place in six public sector cancer hospitals in India (n=2), Jordan (n=1), Malaysia (n=1) and South Africa (n=2) to support implementation of the software in LMICs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from University College London (UCL) and each of the six study sites. If the study objectives are met, the AI-based software will be offered as a not-for-profit web service to public sector state hospitals in LMICs to support expansion of high quality radiotherapy capacity, improving access to and affordability of this key modality of cancer cure and control. Public and policy engagement plans will involve patients as key partners.
    Citation
    Aggarwal A, Court LE, Hoskin P, Jacques I, Kroiss M, Laskar S, et al. ARCHERY: a prospective observational study of artificial intelligence-based radiotherapy treatment planning for cervical, head and neck and prostate cancer - study protocol. BMJ open. 2023 Dec 7;13(12):e077253. PubMed PMID: 38149419. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC10711912. Epub 2023/12/27. eng.
    Journal
    BMJ Open
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/626796
    DOI
    10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077253
    PubMed ID
    38149419
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077253
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077253
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    • Authors: Mavroidis P, Ferreira BC, Shi C, Lind BK, Papanikolaou N
    • Issue date: 2007 Jul 7
    • Evaluation of auto-segmentation accuracy of cloud-based artificial intelligence and atlas-based models.
    • Authors: Urago Y, Okamoto H, Kaneda T, Murakami N, Kashihara T, Takemori M, Nakayama H, Iijima K, Chiba T, Kuwahara J, Katsuta S, Nakamura S, Chang W, Saitoh H, Igaki H
    • Issue date: 2021 Sep 9
    • Noninferiority Study of Automated Knowledge-Based Planning Versus Human-Driven Optimization Across Multiple Disease Sites.
    • Authors: Cornell M, Kaderka R, Hild SJ, Ray XJ, Murphy JD, Atwood TF, Moore KL
    • Issue date: 2020 Feb 1
    • An artificial intelligence-driven agent for real-time head-and-neck IMRT plan generation using conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN).
    • Authors: Li X, Wang C, Sheng Y, Zhang J, Wang W, Yin FF, Wu Q, Wu QJ, Ge Y
    • Issue date: 2021 Jun
    • Towards artificial intelligence-based automated treatment planning in clinical practice: A prospective study of the first clinical experiences in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
    • Authors: Barten DLJ, Pieters BR, Bouter A, van der Meer MC, Maree SC, Hinnen KA, Westerveld H, Bosman PAN, Alderliesten T, van Wieringen N, Bel A
    • Issue date: 2023 Mar-Apr
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.