Standard versus modified ipilimumab, in combination with nivolumab, in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial (PRISM)
Name:
vasudev-et-al-2023-standard-ve ...
Size:
959.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Found with Open Access Button
Authors
Vasudev, NSAinsworth, G
Brown, S
Pickering, L
Waddell, Tom
Fife, K
Griffiths, R
Sharma, A
Katona, E
Howard, H
Velikova, G
Maraveyas, A
Brown, J
Pezaro, C
Tuthill, M
Boleti, E
Bahl, A
Szabados, B
Banks, RE
Brown, J
Venugopal, B
Patel, P
Jain, A
Symeonides, SN
Nathan, P
Collinson, FJ
Powles, T
Affiliation
Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United KingdomIssue Date
2023
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: Ipilimumab (IPI), in combination with nivolumab (NIVO), is an approved frontline treatment option for patients with intermediate- or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We conducted a randomized phase II trial to evaluate whether administering IPI once every 12 weeks (modified), instead of once every 3 weeks (standard), in combination with NIVO, is associated with a favorable toxicity profile. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with clear-cell aRCC were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive four doses of modified or standard IPI, 1 mg/kg, in combination with NIVO (3 mg/kg). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse event (trAE) among those who received at least one dose of therapy. The key secondary end point was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) in the modified arm compared with historical sunitinib control. The study was not designed to formally compare arms for efficacy. Results: Between March 2018 and January 2020, 192 patients (69.8% intermediate/poor-risk) were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug. The incidence of grade 3-5 trAEs was significantly lower among participants receiving modified versus standard IPI (32.8% v 53.1%; odds ratio, 0.43 [90% CI, 0.25 to 0.72]; P = .0075). The 12-month PFS (90% CI) using modified IPI was 46.1% (38.6 to 53.2). At a median follow-up of 21 months, the overall response rate was 45.3% versus 35.9% and the median PFS was 10.8 months versus 9.8 months in the modified and standard IPI groups, respectively. Conclusion: Rates of grade 3-5 trAEs were significantly lower in patients receiving modified versus standard IPI. Although 12-month PFS did not meet the prespecified efficacy threshold compared with historical control, informal comparison of treatment groups did not suggest any reduction in efficacy with the modified schedule.Citation
Vasudev NS, Ainsworth G, Brown S, Pickering L, Waddell T, Fife K, et al. Standard Versus Modified Ipilimumab, in Combination With Nivolumab, in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Trial (PRISM). Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2023 Nov 6:JCO2300236. PubMed PMID: 37931206. Epub 2023/11/06. eng.Journal
Journal Of Clinical OncologyDOI
10.1200/jco.23.00236PubMed ID
37931206Type
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1200/jco.23.00236
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Survival outcomes and independent response assessment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: 42-month follow-up of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial.
- Authors: Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, Arén Frontera O, Melichar B, Powles T, Donskov F, Plimack ER, Barthélémy P, Hammers HJ, George S, Grünwald V, Porta C, Neiman V, Ravaud A, Choueiri TK, Rini BI, Salman P, Kollmannsberger CK, Tykodi SS, Grimm MO, Gurney H, Leibowitz-Amit R, Geertsen PF, Amin A, Tomita Y, McHenry MB, Saggi SS, Tannir NM
- Issue date: 2020 Jul
- Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma: analysis of Japanese patients in CheckMate 214 with extended follow-up.
- Authors: Tomita Y, Kondo T, Kimura G, Inoue T, Wakumoto Y, Yao M, Sugiyama T, Oya M, Fujii Y, Obara W, Motzer RJ, Uemura H
- Issue date: 2020 Jan 24
- Conditional survival and long-term efficacy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
- Authors: Motzer RJ, McDermott DF, Escudier B, Burotto M, Choueiri TK, Hammers HJ, Barthélémy P, Plimack ER, Porta C, George S, Powles T, Donskov F, Gurney H, Kollmannsberger CK, Grimm MO, Barrios C, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Grünwald V, Rini BI, McHenry MB, Lee CW, McCarthy J, Ejzykowicz F, Tannir NM
- Issue date: 2022 Jun 1
- Treatment-free survival and partitioned survival analysis of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib: 5-year update of CheckMate 214.
- Authors: Mantia CM, Jegede OA, Plimack ER, Powles T, Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, Lee CH, Tomita Y, Voss MH, Choueiri TK, Rini BI, Hammers HJ, Escudier B, Albigès L, Rosenblatt L, Atkins MB, Regan MM, McDermott DF
- Issue date: 2024 Jul 25
- Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial.
- Authors: Albiges L, Tannir NM, Burotto M, McDermott D, Plimack ER, Barthélémy P, Porta C, Powles T, Donskov F, George S, Kollmannsberger CK, Gurney H, Grimm MO, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Rini BI, Choueiri TK, Saggi SS, McHenry MB, Motzer RJ
- Issue date: 2020 Nov