NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3trial
Name:
NALIRIFOX versus nab.pdf
Size:
624.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Found with Open Access Button
Authors
Wainberg, ZAMelisi, D
Macarulla, T
Cid, RP
Chandana, SR
De la Fouchardiere, C
Dean, A
Kiss, I
Lee, WJ
Goetze, TO
Van Cutsem, E
Paulson, AS
Bekaii-Saab, T
Pant, S
Hubner, Richard A
Xiao, ZM
Chen, HY
Benzaghou, F
O'Reilly, EM
Affiliation
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKIssue Date
2023
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with few treatment options. NAPOLI 3 aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Methods: NAPOLI 3 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study conducted at 187 community and academic sites in 18 countries worldwide across Europe, North America, South America, Asia, and Australia. Patients with mPDAC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan 50 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2, administered sequentially as a continuous intravenous infusion over 46 h) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle or nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, administered intravenously, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Balanced block randomisation was stratified by geographical region, performance status, and liver metastases, managed through an interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, evaluated when at least 543 events were observed across the two treatment groups. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04083235. Findings: Between Feb 19, 2020 and Aug 17, 2021, 770 patients were randomly assigned (NALIRIFOX, 383; nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, 387; median follow-up 16·1 months [IQR 13·4-19·1]). Median overall survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 10·0-12·1) with NALIRIFOX versus 9·2 months (8·3-10·6) with nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine (hazard ratio 0·83; 95% CI 0·70-0·99; p=0·036). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 322 (87%) of 370 patients receiving NALIRIFOX and 326 (86%) of 379 patients receiving nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine; treatment-related deaths occurred in six (2%) patients in the NALIRIFOX group and eight (2%) patients in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group. Interpretation: Our findings support use of the NALIRIFOX regimen as a possible reference regimen for first-line treatment of mPDAC. Funding: Ipsen. Translation: For the plain language summary see Supplementary Materials section.Citation
Wainberg ZA, Melisi D, Macarulla T, Cid RP, Chandana SR, De la Fouchardiere C, et al. NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3trial. LANCET. 2023 OCT 7;402(10409):1272-81. PubMed PMID: WOS:001089274200001. English.Journal
LancetDOI
10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01366-1PubMed ID
37708904Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01366-1Type
Meetings and ProceedingsLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01366-1
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.
- Authors: Kunzmann V, Siveke JT, Algül H, Goekkurt E, Siegler G, Martens U, Waldschmidt D, Pelzer U, Fuchs M, Kullmann F, Boeck S, Ettrich TJ, Held S, Keller R, Klein I, Germer CT, Stein H, Friess H, Bahra M, Jakobs R, Hartlapp I, Heinemann V, German Pancreatic Cancer Working Group (AIO-PAK) and NEOLAP investigators
- Issue date: 2021 Feb
- Nab-paclitaxel plus either gemcitabine or simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AFUGEM GERCOR): a non-comparative, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial.
- Authors: Bachet JB, Hammel P, Desramé J, Meurisse A, Chibaudel B, André T, Debourdeau P, Dauba J, Lecomte T, Seitz JF, Tournigand C, Aparicio T, Meyer VG, Taieb J, Volet J, Monier A, Bonnetain F, Louvet C
- Issue date: 2017 May
- Alternating gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine alone versus continuous gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel after induction treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (ALPACA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.
- Authors: Dorman K, Boeck S, Caca K, Reichert M, Ettrich TJ, Oettle H, Waidmann O, Modest DP, Müller L, Michl P, Kanzler S, Pink D, Reinacher-Schick A, Geißler M, Pelz H, Kunzmann V, Held S, Schichtl T, Heinemann V, Kullmann F
- Issue date: 2024 Oct
- Cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX versus Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
- Authors: Liu W, Fang Y, Zhang C, Xiang M, Qi L, Su A, Sun Y
- Issue date: 2025 Apr 17
- Dual αV-integrin and neuropilin-1 targeting peptide CEND-1 plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1 study.
- Authors: Dean A, Gill S, McGregor M, Broadbridge V, Järveläinen HA, Price T
- Issue date: 2022 Oct