Risk of local recurrence in men with penile intraepithelial neoplasia in the surgical margin after penile-sparing surgery
Authors
Lee, EstherAntonelli, L.
Issa, Allaudin
Churchill, James
Sachdeva, Ashwin
Oliveira, Pedro
Lau, Maurice W
Sangar, Vijay K
Parnham, Arie S
Fankhauser, Christian D
Affiliation
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United KingdomIssue Date
2023
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: Up to 90% of men with a positive surgical margin show remaining cancer in subsequent reresections. The risk of local recurrence in men with no penile cancer but the precancerous lesion penile intraepithelial neoplasia at the surgical margin is less well studied and was the aim of this analysis. Material and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of men with distal penile cancer undergoing penile-sparing surgery. A competing risks survival analysis adjusted for grade, lymphovascular invasion, and stage was performed to assess local recurrence-free survival in patients with penile intraepithelial neoplasia-positive margins and completely negative surgical margins. Results: A negative surgical margin was described in 319 men (85%), whereas penile intraepithelial neoplasia in the surgical margin was found in 59 men (15%). Local recurrence was observed in 30/319 men with a negative surgical margin compared to 11/59 men with penile intraepithelial neoplasia in the surgical margin. Adjusted for T stage and grade, patients with penile intraepithelial neoplasia at the surgical margin had a higher risk to develop a local recurrence than those with a negative surgical margin without penile intraepithelial neoplasia (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.12, P = .019). Conclusions: Men with a penile intraepithelial neoplasia-positive surgical margin have an increased risk to experience local recurrence compared to men with a negative surgical margin and should undergo closer surveillance and/or adjuvant treatment.Citation
Lee EWC, Antonelli L, Issa A, Churchill J, Sachdeva A, Oliveira P, et al. Risk of Local Recurrence in Men With Penile Intraepithelial Neoplasia in the Surgical Margin After Penile-sparing Surgery. The Journal of urology. 2023 Sep 7:101097JU0000000000003635. PubMed PMID: 37675864. Epub 2023/09/07. eng.Journal
Journal of UrologyDOI
10.1097/ju.0000000000003635PubMed ID
37675864Additional Links
https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000003635Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/ju.0000000000003635
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- A study into the association between local recurrence rates and surgical resection margins in organ-sparing surgery for penile squamous cell cancer.
- Authors: Sri D, Sujenthiran A, Lam W, Minter J, Tinwell BE, Corbishley CM, Yap T, Sharma DM, Ayres BE, Watkin NW
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
- Authors: Alder S, Megyessi D, Sundström K, Östensson E, Mints M, Belkić K, Arbyn M, Andersson S
- Issue date: 2020 Feb
- Carbon dioxide laser treatment of penile intraepithelial neoplasia.
- Authors: Zreik A, Rewhorn M, Vint R, Khan R, Hendry D
- Issue date: 2017 Dec
- Optimal surgical margin for penile-sparing surgery in management of penile cancer-Is 2 cm really necessary?
- Authors: Anderson E, Yao HH, Chee J
- Issue date: 2021 Jul
- Clinical impacts of positive intraepithelial neoplasia at pancreatic transection margin in pancreatic cancer surgery.
- Authors: Takada S, Makino I, Katano K, Sugita H, Tokoro T, Gabata R, Okazaki M, Nakanuma S, Ikeda H, Toyama T, Yagi S
- Issue date: 2024 May