• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Assessment of inter-centre agreement across multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Tirotta, F.
    Hodson, J.
    Alcorn, D.
    Al-Mukhtar, A.
    Ayre, G.
    Barlow, A.
    Chong, P.
    Cosker, T.
    Dileo, P.
    Figueiredo, R.
    French, J.
    Gulamhusein, Aziz
    Jones, R.
    Hayes, A.
    Key, C.
    Malik, H.
    Mahrous, A.
    Mihai, R.
    Nixon, I.
    Partington, K.
    Quinn, M.
    Roberts, J.
    Sayyed, R.
    Shankar, A.
    Strauss, D.
    Turner, P.
    Desai, A.
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
    Issue Date
    2023
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Decision-making in the management of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma is complex and requires input from a number of different specialists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of agreement in terms of resectability, treatment allocation, and organs proposed to be resected across different retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings. Methods: The CT scans and clinical information of 21 anonymized retroperitoneal sarcoma patients were sent to all of the retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings in Great Britain, which were asked to give an opinion about resectability, treatment allocation, and organs proposed to be resected. The main outcome was inter-centre reliability, which was quantified using overall agreement, as well as the chance-corrected Krippendorff's alpha statistic. Based on the latter, the level of agreement was classified as: 'slight' (0.00-0.20), 'fair' (0.21-0.40), 'moderate' (0.41-0.60), 'substantial' (0.61-0.80), or 'near-perfect' (>0.80). Results: Twenty-one patients were reviewed at 12 retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings, giving a total of 252 assessments for analysis. Consistency between centres was only 'slight' to 'fair', with rates of overall agreement and Krippendorff's alpha statistics of 85.4 per cent (211 of 247) and 0.37 (95 per cent c.i. 0.11 to 0.57) for resectability; 80.4 per cent (201 of 250) and 0.39 (95 per cent c.i. 0.33 to 0.45) for treatment allocation; and 53.0 per cent (131 of 247) and 0.20 (95 per cent c.i. 0.17 to 0.23) for the organs proposed to be resected. Depending on the centre that they had attended, 12 of 21 patients could either have been deemed resectable or unresectable, and 10 of 21 could have received either potentially curative or palliative treatment. Conclusions: Inter-centre agreement between retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings was low. Multidisciplinary team meetings may not provide the same standard of care for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma across Great Britain.
    Citation
    Tirotta F, Hodson J, Alcorn D, Al-Mukhtar A, Ayre G, Barlow A, et al. Assessment of inter-centre agreement across multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. The British journal of surgery. 2023 Jun 15. PubMed PMID: 37317571. Epub 2023/06/15. eng.
    Journal
    British Journal of Surgery
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/626368
    DOI
    10.1093/bjs/znad157
    PubMed ID
    37317571
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad157
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1093/bjs/znad157
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation.
    • Authors: Kirkegård J, Aahlin EK, Al-Saiddi M, Bratlie SO, Coolsen M, de Haas RJ, den Dulk M, Fristrup C, Harrison EM, Mortensen MB, Nijkamp MW, Persson J, Søreide JA, Wigmore SJ, Wik T, Mortensen FV
    • Issue date: 2019 May
    • Comment on: Assessment of inter-centre agreement across multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.
    • Authors: Moris D, Blazer DG 3rd
    • Issue date: 2023 Nov 9
    • Author response to: Comment on: Assessment of inter-centre agreement across multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.
    • Authors: Tirotta F, Desai A
    • Issue date: 2023 Nov 9
    • Pediatric patient-specific three-dimensional virtual models for surgical decision making in resection of hepatic and retroperitoneal tumors.
    • Authors: Hampshire J, Dicken BJ, Uruththirakodeeswaran T, Punithakumar K, Noga M
    • Issue date: 2023 Oct
    • Clinically decisive (dis)agreement in multidisciplinary team assessment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; a prospective, national, multicenter study.
    • Authors: Achiam MP, Nordsmark M, Ladekarl M, Olsen A, Loft A, Garbyal RS, Larsen MH, Ainsworth AP, Kristensen TS, Dikinis S, Kjær DW, Bæksgaard L, Siemsen M, Nielsen MB, Schlander S, Kramer S, Katballe N, Kruhlikava I, Tabaksblat E, Fisker RV, Mortensen PB, Holtved E, Eckardt J, Detlefsen S, Naujokaite G, Lütken CD
    • Issue date: 2021 Sep
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.