• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    37308269.pdf
    Size:
    2.274Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Identified with Open Access button
    Download
    Authors
    Gasteiger, N.
    Dowding, D.
    Norman, G.
    McGarrigle, L.
    Eost-Telling, C.
    Jones, D.
    Vercell, Amy
    Ali, S. M.
    O'Connor, S.
    Affiliation
    Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
    Issue Date
    2023
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objectives: To provide an overview of the methodological considerations for conducting commercial smartphone health app reviews (mHealth reviews), with the aim of systematising the process and supporting high-quality evaluations of mHealth apps. Design: Synthesis of our research team's experiences of conducting and publishing various reviews of mHealth apps available on app stores and hand-searching the top medical informatics journals (eg, The Lancet Digital Health, npj Digital Medicine, Journal of Biomedical Informatics and the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association) over the last five years (2018-2022) to identify other app reviews to contribute to the discussion of this method and supporting framework for developing a research (review) question and determining the eligibility criteria. Results: We present seven steps to support rigour in conducting reviews of health apps available on the app market: (1) writing a research question or aims, (2) conducting scoping searches and developing the protocol, (3) determining the eligibility criteria using the TECH framework, (4) conducting the final search and screening of health apps, (5) data extraction, (6) quality, functionality and other assessments and (7) analysis and synthesis of findings. We introduce the novel TECH approach to developing review questions and the eligibility criteria, which considers the Target user, Evaluation focus, Connectedness and the Health domain. Patient and public involvement and engagement opportunities are acknowledged, including co-developing the protocol and undertaking quality or usability assessments. Conclusion: Commercial mHealth app reviews can provide important insights into the health app market, including the availability of apps and their quality and functionality. We have outlined seven key steps for conducting rigorous health app reviews in addition to the TECH acronym, which can support researchers in writing research questions and determining the eligibility criteria. Future work will include a collaborative effort to develop reporting guidelines and a quality appraisal tool to ensure transparency and quality in systematic app reviews.
    Citation
    Gasteiger N, Dowding D, Norman G, McGarrigle L, Eost-Telling C, Jones D, et al. Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide. BMJ open. 2023 Jun 12;13(6):e073283. PubMed PMID: 37308269. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC10277147. Epub 2023/06/13. eng.
    Journal
    BMJ Open
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/626364
    DOI
    10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073283
    PubMed ID
    37308269
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073283
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073283
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Reporting quality of published reviews of commercial and publicly available mobile health apps (mHealth app reviews): a scoping review protocol.
    • Authors: Gasteiger N, Norman G, Grainger R, Eost-Telling C, Jones D, Ali SM, van der Veer SN, Ford CR, Hall A, Law K, Byerly M, Davies A, Paripoorani D, Shi C, Dowding D
    • Issue date: 2024 Jul 4
    • Functionality and Quality of Asthma mHealth Apps and Their Consistency With International Guidelines: Protocol for a Systematic Search and Evaluation of Mobile Apps.
    • Authors: Robinson B, Gong E, Oldenburg B, See K
    • Issue date: 2022 Feb 9
    • Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    • Authors: Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P
    • Issue date: 2022 Feb 1
    • Functionality and Quality of Asthma mHealth Apps and Their Consistency With International Guidelines: Structured Search and Evaluation.
    • Authors: Robinson B, Proimos E, Zou D, Gong E, Oldenburg B, See K
    • Issue date: 2024 Jan 10
    • Dr. Smartphone, can you support my trauma? An informatics analysis study of App Store apps for trauma- and stressor-related disorders.
    • Authors: Ting A, McLachlan C
    • Issue date: 2023
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.