• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    What do women think about having received their breast cancer risk as part of a risk-stratified NHS Breast Screening Programme? A qualitative study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    37225893.pdf
    Size:
    507.6Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Identified with Open Access button
    Download
    Authors
    McWilliams, L.
    Ruane, H.
    Ulph, F.
    Woof, V. G.
    Harrison, F.
    Evans, D Gareth R
    French, David P
    Affiliation
    Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
    Issue Date
    2023
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Risk-stratified screening is being considered for national breast screening programmes. It is unclear how women experience risk-stratified screening and receipt of breast cancer risk information in real time. This study aimed to explore the psychological impact of undergoing risk-stratified screening within England's NHS Breast Screening Programme. Methods: Individual telephone interviews were conducted with 40 women who participated in the BC-Predict study and received a letter indicating their estimated breast cancer risk as one of four risk categories: low (<2% 10-year risk), average (2-4.99%), above average (moderate; 5-7.99%) or high (≥8%). Audio-recorded interview transcriptions were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Two themes were produced: 'From risk expectations to what's my future health story?' highlights that women overall valued the opportunity to receive risk estimates; however, when these were discordant with perceived risk, this causes temporary distress or rejection of the information. 'Being a good (woman) citizen' where women felt positive contributing to society but may feel judged if they then cannot exert agency over the management of their risk or access follow-up support CONCLUSIONS: Risk-stratified breast screening was generally accepted without causing long-lasting distress; however, issues related to risk communication and access to care pathways need to be considered for implementation.
    Citation
    McWilliams L, Ruane H, Ulph F, Woof VG, Harrison F, Evans DG, et al. What do women think about having received their breast cancer risk as part of a risk-stratified NHS Breast Screening Programme? A qualitative study. British journal of cancer. 2023 May 24:1-10. PubMed PMID: 37225893. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC10206350 AstraZeneca and Everything Genetic. Epub 2023/05/25. eng.
    Journal
    British Journal of Cancer
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/626328
    DOI
    10.1038/s41416-023-02268-0
    PubMed ID
    37225893
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02268-0
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1038/s41416-023-02268-0
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • The introduction of risk stratified screening into the NHS breast screening Programme: views from British-Pakistani women.
    • Authors: Woof VG, Ruane H, French DP, Ulph F, Qureshi N, Khan N, Evans DG, Donnelly LS
    • Issue date: 2020 May 20
    • Healthcare professionals' views following implementation of risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme.
    • Authors: Hawkins R, McWilliams L, Ulph F, Evans DG, French DP
    • Issue date: 2022 Oct 12
    • Extending screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer: do they find it acceptable?
    • Authors: McWilliams L, Woof VG, Donnelly LS, Howell A, Evans DG, French DP
    • Issue date: 2021 May 29
    • Introducing a low-risk breast screening pathway into the NHS Breast Screening Programme: Views from healthcare professionals who are delivering risk-stratified screening.
    • Authors: Woof VG, McWilliams L, Donnelly LS, Howell A, Evans DG, Maxwell AJ, French DP
    • Issue date: 2021 Jan-Dec
    • Psychological impact of risk-stratified screening as part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme: multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-Predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).
    • Authors: French DP, McWilliams L, Bowers S, Woof VG, Harrison F, Ruane H, Hendy A, Evans DG
    • Issue date: 2023 Apr
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.