Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuranen, T. A.en
dc.contributor.authorMorra, A.en
dc.contributor.authorKhan, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, D. R.en
dc.contributor.authorBolla, M. K.en
dc.contributor.authorDennis, J.en
dc.contributor.authorKeeman, R.en
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, G.en
dc.contributor.authorParsons, M. T.en
dc.contributor.authorWang, Q.en
dc.contributor.authorAhearn, T. U.en
dc.contributor.authorAittomäki, K.en
dc.contributor.authorAndrulis, I. L.en
dc.contributor.authorArun, B. K.en
dc.contributor.authorBehrens, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBialkowska, K.en
dc.contributor.authorBojesen, S. E.en
dc.contributor.authorCamp, N. J.en
dc.contributor.authorChang-Claude, J.en
dc.contributor.authorCzene, K.en
dc.contributor.authorDevilee, P.en
dc.contributor.authorDomchek, S. M.en
dc.contributor.authorDunning, A. M.en
dc.contributor.authorEngel, C.en
dc.contributor.authorEvans, D Gareth Ren
dc.contributor.authorGago-Dominguez, M.en
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Closas, M.en
dc.contributor.authorGerdes, A. M.en
dc.contributor.authorGlendon, G.en
dc.contributor.authorGuénel, P.en
dc.contributor.authorHahnen, E.en
dc.contributor.authorHamann, U.en
dc.contributor.authorHanson, H.en
dc.contributor.authorHooning, M. J.en
dc.contributor.authorHoppe, R.en
dc.contributor.authorIzatt, L.en
dc.contributor.authorJakubowska, A.en
dc.contributor.authorJames, P. A.en
dc.contributor.authorKristensen, V. N.en
dc.contributor.authorLalloo, F.en
dc.contributor.authorLindeman, G. J.en
dc.contributor.authorMannermaa, A.en
dc.contributor.authorMargolin, S.en
dc.contributor.authorNeuhausen, S. L.en
dc.contributor.authorNewman, W. G.en
dc.contributor.authorPeterlongo, P.en
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, K. A.en
dc.contributor.authorPujana, M. A.en
dc.contributor.authorRantala, J.en
dc.contributor.authorRønlund, K.en
dc.contributor.authorSaloustros, E.en
dc.contributor.authorSchmutzler, R. K.en
dc.contributor.authorSchneeweiss, A.en
dc.contributor.authorSinger, C. F.en
dc.contributor.authorSuvanto, M.en
dc.contributor.authorTan, Y. Y.en
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, M. R.en
dc.contributor.authorThomassen, M.en
dc.contributor.authorTischkowitz, M.en
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, V.en
dc.contributor.authorWappenschmidt, B.en
dc.contributor.authorZhao, E.en
dc.contributor.authorEaston, D. F.en
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, A. C.en
dc.contributor.authorChenevix-Trench, G.en
dc.contributor.authorPharoah, P. D. P.en
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, M. K.en
dc.contributor.authorBlomqvist, C.en
dc.contributor.authorNevanlinna, H.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T10:28:26Z
dc.date.available2023-06-14T10:28:26Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.citationMuranen TA, Morra A, Khan S, Barnes DR, Bolla MK, Dennis J, et al. PREDICT validity for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. NPJ breast cancer. 2023 May 12;9(1):37. PubMed PMID: 37173335. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC10182045 interests. Epub 2023/05/13. eng.en
dc.identifier.pmid37173335en
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41523-023-00546-xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/626306
dc.description.abstractWe assessed the PREDICT v 2.2 for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, using follow-up data from 5453 BRCA1/2 carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). PREDICT for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer had modest discrimination for BRCA1 carrier patients overall (Gönen & Heller unbiased concordance 0.65 in CIMBA, 0.64 in BCAC), but it distinguished clearly the high-mortality group from lower risk categories. In an analysis of low to high risk categories by PREDICT score percentiles, the observed mortality was consistently lower than the expected mortality, but the confidence intervals always included the calibration slope. Altogether, our results encourage the use of the PREDICT ER-negative model in management of breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1 variants. For the PREDICT ER-positive model, the discrimination was slightly lower in BRCA2 variant carriers (concordance 0.60 in CIMBA, 0.65 in BCAC). Especially, inclusion of the tumor grade distorted the prognostic estimates. The breast cancer mortality of BRCA2 carriers was underestimated at the low end of the PREDICT score distribution, whereas at the high end, the mortality was overestimated. These data suggest that BRCA2 status should also be taken into consideration with tumor characteristics, when estimating the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer patients.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00546-xen
dc.titlePREDICT validity for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variantsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finlanden
dc.identifier.journalNPJ Breast Canceren
dc.description.noteen]


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record