Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchifano, N.
dc.contributor.authorFallara, G.
dc.contributor.authorRezvani, Sean
dc.contributor.authorPozzi, E.
dc.contributor.authorChurchill, James
dc.contributor.authorCastiglione, F.
dc.contributor.authorRewhorn, M.
dc.contributor.authorHadway, P.
dc.contributor.authorNigam, R.
dc.contributor.authorRees, R.
dc.contributor.authorSangar, Vijay K
dc.contributor.authorLau, Maurice W
dc.contributor.authorParnham, Arie S
dc.contributor.authorAlnajjar, H.
dc.contributor.authorMuneer, A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-17T09:50:40Z
dc.date.available2023-05-17T09:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.citationSchifano N, Fallara G, Rezvani S, Pozzi E, Churchill J, Castiglione F, et al. Outcomes following radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer using a fascial-sparing surgical technique. World J Urol. 2023 Apr 5. PubMed PMID: 37019998. Epub 2023/04/06. eng.en
dc.identifier.pmid37019998en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-023-04396-xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/626217
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To describe our surgical technique and report the oncological outcomes and complication rates using a fascial-sparing radical inguinal lymphadenectomy (RILND) technique for penile cancer patients with cN+ disease in the inguinal lymph nodes. Methods: Over a 10-year period, 660 fascial-sparing RILND procedures were performed in 421 patients across two specialist penile cancer centres. The technique used a subinguinal incision with an ellipse of skin excised over any palpable nodes. Identification and preservation of the Scarpa's and Camper's fascia was the first step. All superficial inguinal nodes were removed en bloc under this fascial layer with preservation of the subcutaneous veins and fascia lata. The saphenous vein was spared where possible. Patient characteristics, oncologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity were retrospectively collected and analysed. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated the cancer-specific survival (CSS) functions after the procedure. Results: Median (interquartile range, IQR) follow-up was 28 (14-90) months. A median (IQR) number of 8.0 (6.5-10.5) nodes were removed per groin. A total of 153 postoperative complications (36.1%) occurred, including 50 conservatively managed wound infections (11.9%), 21 cases of deep wound dehiscence (5.0%), 104 cases of lymphoedema (24.7%), 3 cases of deep vein thrombosis (0.7%), 1 case of pulmonary embolism (0.2%), and 1 case of postoperative sepsis (0.2%). The 3-year CSS was 86% (95%Confidence Interval [95% CI] 77-96), 83% (95% CI 72-92), 58% (95% CI 51-66), respectively, for the pN1, pN2 and pN3 patients (p < 0.001), compared to a 3-year CSS of 87% (95% CI 84-95) for the pN0 patients. Conclusion: Fascial-sparing RILND offers excellent oncological outcomes whilst decreasing the morbidity rates. Patients with more advanced nodal involvement had poorer survival rates, emphasizing the need for adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04396-xen
dc.titleOutcomes following radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer using a fascial-sparing surgical techniqueen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentMale Genital Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UKen
dc.identifier.journalWorld Journal of Urologyen
dc.description.noteen]


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record