• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Randomised controlled trial of breast cancer and multiple disease prevention weight loss programmes vs written advice amongst women attending a breast cancer family history clinic

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    36841908.pdf
    Size:
    669.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Identified with Open Access button
    Download
    Authors
    Harvie, Michelle N
    French, David P
    Pegington, Mary
    Lombardelli, C.
    Krizak, S.
    Sellers, K.
    Barrett, E.
    Evans, D Gareth R
    Cutress, R.
    Wilding Rgn, A.
    Graves, L.
    Howell, Anthony
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, England
    Issue Date
    2023
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Overweight and obesity are common amongst women attending breast cancer Family History, Risk and Prevention Clinics (FHRPCs). Overweight increases risk of breast cancer (BC) and conditions including1 cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type-2 diabetes (T2D). Clinics provide written health behaviour advice with is likely to have minimal effects. We assessed efficacy of two remotely delivered weight loss programmes vs. written advice. Method: 210 women with overweight or obesity attending three UK FHRPCs were randomised to either a BC prevention programme (BCPP) framed to reduce risk of BC (n = 86), a multiple disease prevention programme (MDPP) framed to reduce risk of BC, CVD and T2D (n = 87), or written advice (n = 37). Change in weight and health behaviours were assessed at 12-months. Results: Weight loss at 12 months was -6.3% (-8.2, -4.5) in BCPP, -6.0% (-7.9, -4.2) in MDPP and -3.3% (-6.2, -0.5) in the written group (p = 0.451 across groups). The percentage losing ≥10% weight in these groups were respectively 34%, 23% and 14% (p = 0.038 across groups). Discussion: BCPP and MDPP programmes resulted in more women achieving ≥10% weight loss, but no evidence of additional benefits of MDPP. A multicentre RCT to test the BCPP across UK FHRPCs is warranted.
    Citation
    Harvie M, French DP, Pegington M, Lombardelli C, Krizak S, Sellers K, et al. Randomised controlled trial of breast cancer and multiple disease prevention weight loss programmes vs written advice amongst women attending a breast cancer family history clinic. British journal of cancer. 2023 Feb 25:1-11. PubMed PMID: 36841908. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC9961304 of an investigator-led Collaborative Research Agreement between SECA GmbH & Co. KG. (Hamburg, Germany), UHS and the University of Southampton. Also institutional research funding by Astra Zeneca (unrelated to this study). The other authors declare no competing interests. Epub 2023/02/26. eng.
    Journal
    British Journal of Cancer
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/626089
    DOI
    10.1038/s41416-023-02207-z
    PubMed ID
    36841908
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02207-z
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1038/s41416-023-02207-z
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Testing a breast cancer prevention and a multiple disease prevention weight loss programme amongst women within the UK NHS breast screening programme-a randomised feasibility study.
    • Authors: Harvie M, French DP, Pegington M, Cooper G, Howell A, McDiarmid S, Lombardelli C, Donnelly L, Ruane H, Sellers K, Barrett E, Armitage CJ, Evans DG
    • Issue date: 2021 Dec 20
    • Breast cancer risk status influences uptake, retention and efficacy of a weight loss programme amongst breast cancer screening attendees: two randomised controlled feasibility trials.
    • Authors: Harvie M, Pegington M, French D, Cooper G, McDiarmid S, Howell A, Donnelly L, Ruane H, Sellers K, Foden P, Evans DG
    • Issue date: 2019 Dec 4
    • The effectiveness of home versus community-based weight control programmes initiated soon after breast cancer diagnosis: a randomised controlled trial.
    • Authors: Harvie M, Pegington M, McMullan D, Bundred N, Livingstone K, Campbell A, Wolstenholme J, Lovato E, Campbell H, Adams J, Speed S, Morris J, Howell S, Howell A
    • Issue date: 2019 Sep
    • Systematic reviews of and integrated report on the quantitative, qualitative and economic evidence base for the management of obesity in men.
    • Authors: Robertson C, Archibald D, Avenell A, Douglas F, Hoddinott P, van Teijlingen E, Boyers D, Stewart F, Boachie C, Fioratou E, Wilkins D, Street T, Carroll P, Fowler C
    • Issue date: 2014 May
    • Tackling obesity in areas of high social deprivation: clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a task-based weight management group programme - a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
    • Authors: McRobbie H, Hajek P, Peerbux S, Kahan BC, Eldridge S, Trépel D, Parrott S, Griffiths C, Snuggs S, Myers Smith K
    • Issue date: 2016 Oct
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.