• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Methodological and reporting standards for quality of life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) credit

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    36549587.pdf
    Size:
    409.8Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Identified with Open Access button
    Download
    Authors
    Oosting, S. F.
    Barriuso, Jorge
    Bottomley, A.
    Galotti, M.
    Gyawali, B.
    Kiesewetter, B.
    Latino, N. J.
    Martinelli, F.
    Pe, M.
    Pentheroudakis, G.
    Roitberg, F.
    Vachon, H.
    de Vries, E. G. E.
    Piccart, M.
    Cherny, N. I.
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    Issue Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: The ESMO-MCBS has been developed to grade clinical benefit of cancer therapies. Improvement in quality of life (QoL) is considered relevant, especially in the non-curative setting. This is reflected by an upgrade of the preliminary ESMO-MCBS score if QoL is improved compared to the control arm or a downgrade if an improvement in progression free survival is not paralleled by an improvement in QoL or overall survival. Given the importance of QoL for the final score, a need to ensure the robustness of QoL data was recognised. Design: A checklist was created based on existing guidelines for QoL research. Field-testing was performed using clinical trials that either received an adjustment of the preliminary ESMO-MCBS score based on QoL, or had QoL as the primary endpoint. Several rounds of revision and re-testing of the checklist were undertaken until a final consensus was reached. Results: The final checklist consists of four items and can be applied if three prerequisites are met: (1) QoL is at least a secondary endpoint, (2) evidence of reliability and validity of the instrument is provided and (3) a statistically and clinically significant improvement in QoL is observed. The four items on the checklist pertain to the (1) hypothesis, (2) compliance and missing data, (3) presentation of the results, and (4) statistical and clinical relevance. Field-testing revealed that a clear QoL hypothesis and correction for multiple testing were mostly lacking, while the main statistical method was always described. Conclusions: Implementation of the ESMO-MCBS QoL checklist will facilitate objective and transparent decision-making on QoL data within the ESMO-MCBS scoring process. Trials published until 1 January 2025 will have to meet the prerequisites and at least two items for crediting QoL benefit in the final ESMO-MCBS score. Trials published thereafter will have to meet all four items
    Citation
    Oosting SF, Barriuso J, Bottomley A, Galotti M, Gyawali B, Kiesewetter B, et al. Methodological and reporting standards for quality of life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) credit. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2022 Dec 14. PubMed PMID: 36549587. Epub 2022/12/23. eng.
    Journal
    Annals of Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/625929
    DOI
    10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.004
    PubMed ID
    36549587
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.004
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.004
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring.
    • Authors: Gyawali B, de Vries EGE, Dafni U, Amaral T, Barriuso J, Bogaerts J, Calles A, Curigliano G, Gomez-Roca C, Kiesewetter B, Oosting S, Passaro A, Pentheroudakis G, Piccart M, Roitberg F, Tabernero J, Tarazona N, Trapani D, Wester R, Zarkavelis G, Zielinski C, Zygoura P, Cherny NI
    • Issue date: 2021 Jun
    • Lessons learnt from scoring adjuvant colon cancer trials and meta-analyses using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale V.1.1.
    • Authors: Knapen DG, Cherny NI, Zygoura P, Latino NJ, Douillard JY, Dafni U, de Vries EGE, de Groot DJ
    • Issue date: 2020 Sep
    • Clinical benefit of controversial first line systemic therapies for advanced stage ovarian cancer - ESMO-MCBS scores.
    • Authors: Broekman KE, Jalving M, van Tinteren H, Sessa C, Reyners AKL
    • Issue date: 2018 Sep
    • Clinical benefit of systemic therapies for recurrent ovarian cancer-ESMO-MCBS scores.
    • Authors: Broekman KE, van Kruchten M, van Tinteren H, Sessa C, Jalving M, Reyners AKL
    • Issue date: 2021 Aug
    • ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1.
    • Authors: Cherny NI, Dafni U, Bogaerts J, Latino NJ, Pentheroudakis G, Douillard JY, Tabernero J, Zielinski C, Piccart MJ, de Vries EGE
    • Issue date: 2017 Oct 1
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.