• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Amplifying the patient voice: a survey of practitioners' use of patient-reported outcome measures across radiotherapy providers in England

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    36443139.pdf
    Size:
    1.433Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Identified with Open Access button
    Download
    Authors
    Oliver, L. A.
    Hutton, Daniel
    Hall, T
    Cain, M.
    Bates, M.
    Cree, A.
    Mullen, E.
    Affiliation
    University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
    Issue Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Aims: The NHS England Radiotherapy Service Specification calls for routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, barriers exist at patient, healthcare professional and service levels. The aim of the present study was to determine the current use of PROMs within radiotherapy services in England. The current attitudes, barriers and enablers to the implementation of PROMs in radiotherapy practice were evaluated and practical recommendations to inform future implementation were developed. Materials and methods: A mixed-methods approach was adopted to obtain quantitative and qualitative data. An online questionnaire was developed and disseminated to all radiotherapy operational delivery network managers across England. The questionnaire consisted of 12 open and closed questions relating to PROMs use, with the option to provide free-text responses. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on free-text comments, whereas descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Results: In total, 182 responses were received from 40 of the 50 radiotherapy providers, resulting in a response rate of 84%. The current use of PROMs was analysed, including rationale for use, tools used, format of PROMs collection and timing within the radiotherapy pathway. Most respondents indicated that PROMs were used in the context of clinical trials only. Through thematic analysis, four identical key themes were identified relating to both barriers and enablers to PROMs use; these included IT infrastructure, time, human/financial resources and training/education. A fifth theme, standardisation, was identified as a key enabler to PROMs use. Conclusions: Our findings show that outside of clinical trials, PROMs are not routinely used in radiotherapy services due to barriers identified at professional and service levels. Here we provide recommendations to mitigate the barriers identified and implement PROMs in radiotherapy, including training for healthcare professionals and standardisation of PROMs tools and storage. This study provides a key first step in driving PROMs implementation within radiotherapy services across England.
    Citation
    Oliver LA, Hutton DP, Hall T, Cain M, Bates M, Cree A, et al. Amplifying the Patient Voice: A Survey of Practitioners' Use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures Across Radiotherapy Providers in England. Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)). 2022 Nov 25. PubMed PMID: 36443139. Epub 2022/11/29. eng.
    Journal
    Clinical Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/625878
    DOI
    10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.004
    PubMed ID
    36443139
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.004
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.004
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Developing theory-informed knowledge translation strategies to facilitate the use of patient-reported outcome measures in interdisciplinary low back pain clinical practices in Quebec: mixed methods study.
    • Authors: Eilayyan O, Visca R, Zidarov D, Ware P, Bussières A, Ahmed S
    • Issue date: 2020 Aug 25
    • Attitudes, experiences, and preferences of ophthalmic professionals regarding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice.
    • Authors: Robertson AO, Tadić V, Rahi JS
    • Issue date: 2020
    • General practitioners' views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study.
    • Authors: Turner GM, Litchfield I, Finnikin S, Aiyegbusi OL, Calvert M
    • Issue date: 2020 Jan 24
    • Facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: An academic center's initial experience.
    • Authors: Amini M, Oemrawsingh A, Verweij LM, Lingsma HF, Hazelzet JA, Eijkenaar F, van Leeuwen N
    • Issue date: 2021 Sep
    • Development of an implementation strategy for routine collection of generic patient reported outcome measures: a qualitative study in multidisciplinary community rehabilitation.
    • Authors: Jolliffe L, Andrew NE, Srikanth V, Beare R, Noeske KE, Snowdon DA
    • Issue date: 2024 Aug
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.