• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Evaluating the effectiveness of deep learning contouring across multiple radiotherapy centres

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    36405563.pdf
    Size:
    1.306Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Identified with Open Access button
    Download
    Authors
    Walker, Z.
    Bartley, G.
    Hague, Christina
    Kelly, D.
    Navarro, C.
    Rogers, J.
    South, C.
    Temple, S.
    Whitehurst, Philip
    Chuter, Robert
    Affiliation
    Medical Physics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
    Issue Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background and purpose: Deep learning contouring (DLC) has the potential to decrease contouring time and variability of organ contours. This work evaluates the effectiveness of DLC for prostate and head and neck across four radiotherapy centres using a commercial system. Materials and methods: Computed tomography scans of 123 prostate and 310 head and neck patients were evaluated. Besides one head and neck model, generic DLC models were used. Contouring time using centres' existing clinical methods and contour editing time after DLC were compared. Timing was evaluated using paired and non-paired studies. Commercial software or in-house scripts assessed dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and distance to agreement (DTA). One centre assessed head and neck inter-observer variability. Results: The mean contouring time saved for prostate structures using DLC compared to the existing clinical method was 5.9 ± 3.5 min. The best agreement was shown for the femoral heads (median DSC 0.92 ± 0.03, median DTA 1.5 ± 0.3 mm) and the worst for the rectum (median DSC 0.68 ± 0.04, median DTA 4.6 ± 0.6 mm). The mean contouring time saved for head and neck structures using DLC was 16.2 ± 8.6 min. For one centre there was no DLC time-saving compared to an atlas-based method. DLC contours reduced inter-observer variability compared to manual contours for the brainstem, left parotid gland and left submandibular gland. Conclusions: Generic prostate and head and neck DLC models can provide time-savings which can be assessed with paired or non-paired studies to integrate with clinical workload. Reducing inter-observer variability potential has been shown.
    Citation
    Walker Z, Bartley G, Hague C, Kelly D, Navarro C, Rogers J, et al. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres. Physics and imaging in radiation oncology. 2022 Oct;24:121-8. PubMed PMID: 36405563. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC9668733. Epub 2022/11/22. eng.
    Journal
    Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/625864
    DOI
    10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.003
    PubMed ID
    36405563
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.003
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.003
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Improving automatic delineation for head and neck organs at risk by Deep Learning Contouring.
    • Authors: van Dijk LV, Van den Bosch L, Aljabar P, Peressutti D, Both S, J H M Steenbakkers R, Langendijk JA, Gooding MJ, Brouwer CL
    • Issue date: 2020 Jan
    • An evaluation of MR based deep learning auto-contouring for planning head and neck radiotherapy.
    • Authors: Hague C, McPartlin A, Lee LW, Hughes C, Mullan D, Beasley W, Green A, Price G, Whitehurst P, Slevin N, van Herk M, West C, Chuter R
    • Issue date: 2021 May
    • Technology assessment of automated atlas based segmentation in prostate bed contouring.
    • Authors: Hwee J, Louie AV, Gaede S, Bauman G, D'Souza D, Sexton T, Lock M, Ahmad B, Rodrigues G
    • Issue date: 2011 Sep 9
    • Clinical Evaluation of Deep Learning and Atlas-Based Auto-Contouring of Bladder and Rectum for Prostate Radiation Therapy.
    • Authors: Zabel WJ, Conway JL, Gladwish A, Skliarenko J, Didiodato G, Goorts-Matthews L, Michalak A, Reistetter S, King J, Nakonechny K, Malkoske K, Tran MN, McVicar N
    • Issue date: 2021 Jan-Feb
    • Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center.
    • Authors: D'Aviero A, Re A, Catucci F, Piccari D, Votta C, Piro D, Piras A, Di Dio C, Iezzi M, Preziosi F, Menna S, Quaranta F, Boschetti A, Marras M, Miccichè F, Gallus R, Indovina L, Bussu F, Valentini V, Cusumano D, Mattiucci GC
    • Issue date: 2022 Jul 25
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.