• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Healthcare professionals' views following implementation of risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    36224549.pdf
    Size:
    1.017Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Identified with Open Access button
    Download
    Authors
    Hawkins, Rachel
    McWilliams, L.
    Ulph, F.
    Evans, D. G.
    French, D. P.
    Affiliation
    The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
    Issue Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: It is crucial to determine feasibility of risk-stratified screening to facilitate successful implementation. We introduced risk-stratification (BC-Predict) into the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) at three screening sites in north-west England from 2019 to 2021. The present study investigated the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on acceptability, barriers, and facilitators of the BC-Predict intervention and on the wider implementation of risk-based screening after BC-Predict was implemented in their screening site. Methods: Fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with HCPs working across the breast screening pathway at three NHSBSP sites that implemented BC-Predict. Thematic analysis interpreted the data. Results: Three pre-decided themes were produced. (1) Acceptability of risk-based screening: risk-stratification was perceived as a beneficial step for both services and women. HCPs across the pathway reported low burden of running the BC-Predict trial on routine tasks, but with some residual concerns; (2) Barriers to implementation: comprised capacity constraints of services including the inadequacy of current IT systems to manage women with different risk profiles and, (3) Facilitators to implementation: included the continuation of stakeholder consultation across the pathway to inform implementation and need for dedicated risk screening admin staff, a push for mammography staff recruitment and guidance for screening services. Telephone helplines, integrating primary care, and supporting access for all language needs was emphasised. Conclusion: Risk-stratified breast screening was viewed as a progressive step providing it does not worsen inequalities for women. Implementation of risk-stratified breast screening requires staff to be reassured that there will be systems in place to support implementation and that it will not further burden their workload. Next steps require a comprehensive assessment of the resource needed for risk-stratification versus current resource availability, upgrades to screening IT and building screening infrastructure. The role of primary care needs to be determined. Simplification and clarification of risk-based screening pathways is needed to support HCPs agency and facilitate implementation. Forthcoming evidence from ongoing randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of breast cancer risk-stratification will also determine implementation.
    Citation
    Hawkins R, McWilliams L, Ulph F, Evans DG, French DP. Healthcare professionals' views following implementation of risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme. BMC cancer. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):1058. PubMed PMID: 36224549. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC9555254. Epub 2022/10/13. eng.
    Journal
    BMC Cancer
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/625714
    DOI
    10.1186/s12885-022-10134-0
    PubMed ID
    36224549
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10134-0
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1186/s12885-022-10134-0
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • The feasibility of implementing risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme: a focus group study investigating the perspectives of healthcare personnel responsible for delivery.
    • Authors: French DP, Woof VG, Ruane H, Evans DG, Ulph F, Donnelly LS
    • Issue date: 2022 May 2
    • What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).
    • Authors: French DP, Astley S, Brentnall AR, Cuzick J, Dobrashian R, Duffy SW, Gorman LS, Harkness EF, Harrison F, Harvie M, Howell A, Jerrison A, Machin M, Maxwell AJ, McWilliams L, Payne K, Qureshi N, Ruane H, Sampson S, Stavrinos P, Thorpe E, Ulph F, van Staa T, Woof V, Evans DG
    • Issue date: 2020 Jun 18
    • Healthcare professionals' experiences of caring for women with false-positive screening test results in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.
    • Authors: Long HA, Brooks JM, Maxwell AJ, Peters S, Harvie M, French DP
    • Issue date: 2024 Apr
    • The introduction of risk stratified screening into the NHS breast screening Programme: views from British-Pakistani women.
    • Authors: Woof VG, Ruane H, French DP, Ulph F, Qureshi N, Khan N, Evans DG, Donnelly LS
    • Issue date: 2020 May 20
    • Introducing a low-risk breast screening pathway into the NHS Breast Screening Programme: Views from healthcare professionals who are delivering risk-stratified screening.
    • Authors: Woof VG, McWilliams L, Donnelly LS, Howell A, Evans DG, Maxwell AJ, French DP
    • Issue date: 2021 Jan-Dec
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.