• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78-94

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    35858992.pdf
    Size:
    2.710Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Identified with Open Access button
    Download
    Authors
    Michalowska, M. M.
    Herholz, K.
    Hinz, R.
    Amadi, C.
    McInnes, L.
    Anton-Rodriguez, Jose M
    Karikari, T. K.
    Blennow, K.
    Zetterberg, H.
    Ashton, N. J.
    Pendleton, N.
    Carter, S. F.
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
    Issue Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition is common in cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly >85 years. This study investigated amyloid distribution and evaluated three published in vivo amyloid-PET staging schemes from a cognitively unimpaired (CU) cohort aged 84.9 ± 4.3 years (n = 75). SUV-based principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to 18F-flutemetamol PET data to determine an unbiased regional covariance pattern of tracer uptake across grey matter regions. PET staging schemes were applied to the data and compared to the PCA output. Concentration of p-tau181 was measured in blood plasma. The PCA revealed three distinct components accounting for 91.2% of total SUV variance. PC1 driven by the large common variance of uptake in neocortical and striatal regions was significantly positively correlated with global SUVRs, APOE4 status and p-tau181 concentration. PC2 represented mainly non-specific uptake in typical amyloid-PET reference regions, and PC3 the occipital lobe. Application of the staging schemes demonstrated that the majority of the CU cohort (up to 93%) were classified as having pathological amount and distribution of Aβ. Good correspondence existed between binary (+/-) classification and later amyloid stages, however, substantial differences existed between schemes for low stages with 8-17% of individuals being unstageable, i.e., not following the sequential progression of Aβ deposition. In spite of the difference in staging outcomes there was broad spatial overlap between earlier stages and PC1, most prominently in default mode network regions. This study critically evaluated the utility of in vivo amyloid staging from a single PET scan in CU elderly and found that early amyloid stages could not be consistently classified. The majority of the cohort had pathological Aβ, thus, it remains an open topic what constitutes abnormal brain Aβ in the oldest-old and what is the best method to determine that.
    Citation
    Michalowska MM, Herholz K, Hinz R, Amadi C, McInnes L, Anton-Rodriguez JM, et al. Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78-94. Molecular psychiatry. 2022 Jul 20. PubMed PMID: 35858992. Epub 2022/07/21. eng.
    Journal
    Molecular Psychiatry
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/625441
    DOI
    10.1038/s41380-022-01685-6
    PubMed ID
    35858992
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01685-6
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1038/s41380-022-01685-6
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Biomarker-Based Prediction of Longitudinal Tau Positron Emission Tomography in Alzheimer Disease.
    • Authors: Leuzy A, Smith R, Cullen NC, Strandberg O, Vogel JW, Binette AP, Borroni E, Janelidze S, Ohlsson T, Jögi J, Ossenkoppele R, Palmqvist S, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Klein G, Stomrud E, Hansson O
    • Issue date: 2022 Feb 1
    • Relationships between flortaucipir PET tau binding and amyloid burden, clinical diagnosis, age and cognition.
    • Authors: Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD Sr, Navitsky M, Lu M, Salloway S, Schaerf FW, Jennings D, Arora AK, McGeehan A, Lim NC, Xiong H, Joshi AD, Siderowf A, Mintun MA, 18F-AV-1451-A05 investigators
    • Issue date: 2017 Mar 1
    • Spatial Extent of Amyloid-β Levels and Associations With Tau-PET and Cognition.
    • Authors: Ozlen H, Pichet Binette A, Köbe T, Meyer PF, Gonneaud J, St-Onge F, Provost K, Soucy JP, Rosa-Neto P, Breitner J, Poirier J, Villeneuve S, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, the Harvard Aging Brain Study, the Presymptomatic Evaluation of Experimental or Novel Treatments for Alzheimer Disease Research Group
    • Issue date: 2022 Oct 1
    • Longitudinal 18F-MK-6240 tau tangles accumulation follows Braak stages.
    • Authors: Pascoal TA, Benedet AL, Tudorascu DL, Therriault J, Mathotaarachchi S, Savard M, Lussier FZ, Tissot C, Chamoun M, Kang MS, Stevenson J, Massarweh G, Guiot MC, Soucy JP, Gauthier S, Rosa-Neto P
    • Issue date: 2021 Dec 16
    • Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of the relationship between Aβ deposition, cortical thickness, and memory in cognitively unimpaired individuals and in Alzheimer disease.
    • Authors: Doré V, Villemagne VL, Bourgeat P, Fripp J, Acosta O, Chetélat G, Zhou L, Martins R, Ellis KA, Masters CL, Ames D, Salvado O, Rowe CC
    • Issue date: 2013 Jul
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.