Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeresford, L.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, P.
dc.contributor.authorDias, S.
dc.contributor.authorClaxton, L.
dc.contributor.authorWalton, M.
dc.contributor.authorMetcalf, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSchlecht, H.
dc.contributor.authorOttensmeier, C.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, M.
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-17T09:45:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-17T09:45:33Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.citationBeresford L, Murphy P, Dias S, Claxton L, Walton M, Metcalf R, et al. Appraising the Costs of Genomic Testing for Histology-Independent Technologies: An Illustrative Example for NTRK Fusions. Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2022 Jul;25(7):1133-40. PubMed PMID: 35779940. Epub 2022/07/03. eng.en
dc.identifier.pmid35779940en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1359en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10541/625410
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Histology-independent (HI) technologies are authorized for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer if they express a particular biomarker regardless of its position in the body. Although this represents an important advancement in cancer treatment, genomic testing to identify eligible individuals for HI technologies will require substantial investment and impact their cost-effectiveness. Estimating these costs is complicated by several issues, which affect not only the overall cost of testing but also the distribution of testing costs across tumor types. Methods: Key issues that should be considered when evaluating the cost of genomic testing to identify those eligible for HI technologies are discussed. These issues are explored in illustrative analyses where costs of genomic testing for NTRK fusions in England for recently approved HI technologies are estimated. Results: The prevalence of mutation, testing strategy adopted, and current testing provision affect the cost of identifying eligible patients. The illustrative analysis estimated the cost of RNA-based next-generation sequencing to identify 1 individual with an NTRK fusion ranged between £377 and £282 258. To improve cost-effectiveness, testing costs could be shared across multiple technologies. An estimated additional ∼4000 patients would need to be treated with other HI therapies for testing in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer to be cost-effective. Conclusions: The cost of testing to identify individuals eligible for HI technologies affect the drug's cost-effectiveness. The cost of testing across tumor types varies owing to heterogeneity in the mutation's prevalence and current testing provision. The cost-effectiveness of HI technologies may be improved if testing costs could be shared across multiple agents.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1359en
dc.titleAppraising the costs of genomic testing for histology-independent technologies: an illustrative example for NTRK fusionsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, England, UKen
dc.identifier.journalValue Healthen
dc.description.noteen]


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record