• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • The Christie Research Publications Repository
    • All Christie Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChristieCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    The Christie WebsiteChristie Library and Knowledge Service

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    What Is the most effective management of the primary tumor in men with invasive penile cancer: a systematic review of the available treatment options and their outcomes

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    EurUrolSakalis.pdf
    Size:
    1.522Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    From UNPAYWALL
    Download
    Authors
    Sakalis, V. I.
    Campi, R.
    Barreto, L.
    Perdomo, H. G.
    Greco, I.
    Zapala, Ł.
    Kailavasan, M.
    Antunes-Lopes, T.
    Marcus, J. D.
    Manzie, K.
    Osborne, J.
    Ayres, B.
    Moonen, L. M. F.
    Necchi, A.
    Crook, J.
    Oliveira, Pedro
    Pagliaro, L. C.
    Protzel, C.
    Parnham, Arie S
    Albersen, M.
    Pettaway, C. A.
    Spiess, P. E.
    Tagawa, S. T.
    Rumble, R. B.
    Brouwer, O. R.
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Department of Urology, Agios Pavlos General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
    Issue Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Context: The primary lesion in penile cancer is managed by surgery or radiation. Surgical options include penile-sparing surgery, amputative surgery, laser excision, and Moh's micrographic surgery. Radiation is applied as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. The treatment aims to completely remove the primary lesion and preserve a sufficient functional penile stump. Objective: To assess whether the 5-yr recurrence-free rate and other outcomes, such as sexual function, quality of life, urination, and penile preserving length, vary between various treatment options. Evidence acquisition: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane HTA, DARE, HEED), Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for publications from 1990 through May 2021. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. Evidence synthesis: The systematic review included 88 studies, involving 9578 men from 16 NRCSs and 72 CSs. The cumulative mean 5-yr recurrence-free rates were 82.0% for penile-sparing surgery, 83.9% for amputative surgery, 78.6% for brachytherapy, 55.2% for EBRT, 69.4% for lasers, and 88.2% for Moh's micrographic surgery, as reported from CSs, and 76.7% for penile-sparing surgery and 93.3% for amputative surgery, as reported from NRCSs. Penile surgery affects sexual function, but amputative surgery causes more appearance concerns. After brachytherapy, 25% of patients reported sexual dysfunction. Both penile-sparing surgery and amputative surgery affect all aspects of psychosocial well-being. Conclusions: Despite the poor quality of evidence, data suggest that penile-sparing surgery is not inferior to amputative surgery in terms of recurrence rates in selected patients. Based on the available information, however, broadly applicable recommendations cannot be made; appropriate patient selection accounts for the relative success of all the available methods. Patient summary: We reviewed the evidence of various techniques to treat penile tumor and assessed their effectiveness in oncologic control and their functional outcomes. Penile-sparing as well as amputative surgery is an effective treatment option, but amputative surgery has a negative impact on sexual function. Penile-sparing surgery and radiotherapy are associated with a higher risk of local recurrence, but preserve sexual function and quality of life better. Laser and Moh's micrographic surgery could be used for smaller lesions.
    Citation
    Sakalis VI, Campi R, Barreto L, Garcia-Perdomo HA, Greco I, Zapala Ł, et al. What Is the Most Effective Management of the Primary Tumor in Men with Invasive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Available Treatment Options and Their Outcomes. Vol. 40, European Urology Open Science. Elsevier BV; 2022. p. 58–94.
    Journal
    European Urology Open Science
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10541/625302
    DOI
    10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.002
    PubMed ID
    35540709
    Additional Links
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.002
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.002
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    All Christie Publications

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Benefits and Risks of Primary Treatments for High-risk Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Systematic Review.
    • Authors: Moris L, Cumberbatch MG, Van den Broeck T, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Kelly B, Pal R, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, Fanti S, Gillessen S, Grummet JP, Henry AM, Lam TBL, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Omar MI, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, van Der Kwast TH, van Der Poel HG, Willemse PM, Yuan CY, Konety B, Dorff T, Jain S, Mottet N, Wiegel T
    • Issue date: 2020 May
    • Ablative therapy for people with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    • Authors: Ramsay CR, Adewuyi TE, Gray J, Hislop J, Shirley MD, Jayakody S, MacLennan G, Fraser C, MacLennan S, Brazzelli M, N'Dow J, Pickard R, Robertson C, Rothnie K, Rushton SP, Vale L, Lam TB
    • Issue date: 2015 Jul
    • Primary penile cancer organ sparing treatment.
    • Authors: Sosnowski R, Kuligowski M, Kuczkiewicz O, Moskal K, Wolski JK, Bjurlin MA, Wysock JS, Pęczkowski P, Protzel C, Demkow T
    • Issue date: 2016
    • Quality of Life Outcomes after Primary Treatment for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    • Authors: Lardas M, Liew M, van den Bergh RC, De Santis M, Bellmunt J, Van den Broeck T, Cornford P, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Bolla M, Briers E, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Mottet N, van der Poel HG, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Yuan CY, Bourke L
    • Issue date: 2017 Dec
    • Free Graft Augmentation Urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Which Technique Is Best? A Systematic Review.
    • Authors: Barratt R, Chan G, La Rocca R, Dimitropoulos K, Martins FE, Campos-Juanatey F, Greenwell TJ, Waterloos M, Riechardt S, Osman NI, Yuan Y, Esperto F, Ploumidis A, Lumen N, European Association of Urology Urethral Strictures Guidelines Panel
    • Issue date: 2021 Jul
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.