Authors
Whiteman, D. C.Olsen, C. M.
MacGregor, S.
Law, M. H.
Thompson, B.
Dusingize, J. C.
Green, Adèle C
Neale, R. E.
Pandeya, N.
Affiliation
Departments of Population Health and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, AustraliaIssue Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Cutaneous melanomas are common cancers in white populations and early detection is promoted as a means of reducing morbidity and mortality. There is concern that increased skin screening is leading to overdiagnosis of indolent melanomas with low risk of lethality. The extent of melanoma overdiagnosis associated with screening is unknown. Objective: We sought to estimate possible overdiagnosis by comparing subsequent melanoma incidence and biopsy rates among people subjected to skin screening with those who were not. Methods: We recruited 43,762 residents of Queensland, Australia aged 40-69 years with no prior history of melanoma, selected at random from a population register in 2010. At baseline, participants completed a comprehensive melanoma risk factor survey, and were asked if their skin had been examined by a doctor in the 3 years prior to baseline. We calculated incidence and relative risk of histologically confirmed melanoma (invasive and in situ) in years 2 to 7 of follow-up, obtained through linkage to the cancer registry. In secondary analyses, we measured biopsy rates in years 2 to 6 of follow-up. We used propensity score analysis to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: 28,155 (73%) participants underwent skin screening prior to baseline. We observed 967 first incident melanomas (381 invasive) during 197,191 person-years of follow-up. Those screened had higher rates of melanoma (aHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02-1.63) and subsequent skin biopses (aHR 1.85, 95% CI 1.69-2.04) than unscreened participants. The higher risk associated with skin screening was evident for in situ melanoma (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.92) but not invasive melanoma (aHR 1.05, 95% CI 0.72-1.54). In secondary analyses where screening was defined as having a skin biopsy in the first year after baseline, we observed significantly increased risks of melanoma (adjusted aHR 1.53, 95%CI 1.23-1.89) and subsequent biopsies (aHR 2.64, 95% CI 2.46-2.84) relative to those who did not have a biopsy. Conclusions: People who undergo skin screening subsequently experience higher rates of biopsies and melanoma (especially in situ melanoma), even after adjusting for all known risk factors, consistent with overdiagnosis.Citation
Whiteman DC, Olsen CM, MacGregor S, Law MH, Thompson B, Dusingize JC, et al. The effect of screening on melanoma incidence and biopsy rates. British Journal of Dermatology. Wiley; 2022.Journal
British Journal of DermatologyDOI
10.1111/bjd.21649PubMed ID
35531668Additional Links
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21649Type
ArticleLanguage
enae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/bjd.21649
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Distribution of subsequent primary invasive melanomas following a first primary invasive or in situ melanoma Queensland, Australia, 1982-2010.
- Authors: Youlden DR, Youl PH, Soyer HP, Aitken JF, Baade PD
- Issue date: 2014 May
- Five-Year Outcomes of a Melanoma Screening Initiative in a Large Health Care System.
- Authors: Matsumoto M, Wack S, Weinstock MA, Geller A, Wang H, Solano FX, Kirkwood JM, Ferris LK
- Issue date: 2022 May 1
- Suicidal Ideation.
- Authors: Harmer B, Lee S, Duong TVH, Saadabadi A
- Issue date: 2022 Jan
- Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults.
- Authors: Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Matin RN, Thomson DR, Wong KY, Aldridge RB, Abbott R, Fawzy M, Bayliss SE, Grainge MJ, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Godfrey K, Walter FM, Williams HC, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group
- Issue date: 2018 Dec 4